Re: Unified automake init (was Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem)

2013-01-06 Thread Gaetan Nadon
On 13-01-06 06:02 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 04:22:05PM -0500, Gaetan Nadon wrote: On 13-01-03 10:18 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:55:49PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 01/ 3/13 03:38 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: is there any particular

Re: Unified automake init (was Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem)

2013-01-04 Thread Gaetan Nadon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13-01-03 10:18 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:55:49PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 01/ 3/13 03:38 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: is there any particular reason we're still generating gz and bzip2? Because we're not hip

Unified automake init (was Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem)

2013-01-03 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:55:49PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 01/ 3/13 03:38 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: is there any particular reason we're still generating gz and bzip2? Because we're not hip enough to have replaced gz with xz like all the cool kids? Or because updating the