I want to add documentation as an Xorg GSoC 2011 project. Should any
student choose it, you guys be up for being pestered?
Matt
On 02/03/2011 03:10 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 06:50:23PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith
This should proba
Sure, but remember that GSoC projects are supposed to be equivalent to a
full-time job for 3 months, so it would have to be a bit more than just
fixing the documentation for a single library.
Perhaps something on the order of the long dreamed about integration of the
protocol specs into the XCB XM
I didn't want to be presumptious and volunteer everyone on the list as a
mentor for docs updating. Peter's reply was a nice entryway into asking
people.
There's lots of docs that need some lovin'. Content-wise, style-wise, xml
tags update-wise. More than enough work to keep a couple people bu
On 15:04 Thu 03 Feb , Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Sure, but remember that GSoC projects are supposed to be equivalent to a
> full-time job for 3 months, so it would have to be a bit more than just
> fixing the documentation for a single library.
Unfortunately, GSoC projects have to be coding, no
On 02/08/2011 09:18 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 15:04 Thu 03 Feb , Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Sure, but remember that GSoC projects are supposed to be equivalent to a
full-time job for 3 months, so it would have to be a bit more than just
fixing the documentation for a single library.
Unfor
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:18:47AM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 15:04 Thu 03 Feb , Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > Sure, but remember that GSoC projects are supposed to be equivalent to a
> > full-time job for 3 months, so it would have to be a bit more than just
> > fixing the documentation
