On 05/ 5/12 10:27 AM, Pander wrote:
On 2012-05-05 05:23, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 04/19/12 11:35 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 17:56:47 +0200, Pander wrote:
Could you please apply that one already so it is of the list and we
discuss the rest below? THanks.
Please send
JH == Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com writes:
JH This commit introduced a 'make check' failure due by duplicating
JH existing entries:
I ran compose-check.pl while reviewing it, but on the .pre files rather
than on the compiled files. ☹
I'll have to work on a patch to that script to
On 05/10/2012 06:24 PM, James Cloos wrote:
JH == Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com writes:
JH This commit introduced a 'make check' failure due by duplicating
JH existing entries:
I ran compose-check.pl while reviewing it, but on the .pre files rather
than on the compiled files. ☹
This commit introduced a 'make check' failure due by duplicating existing
entries:
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/jeremy/src/freedesktop/jhbuild/src/xorg/lib/libX11/nls'
Clash with existing sequence in en_US.UTF-8/Compose on line 5826: Multi_key
equal slash
line #5826: Multi_key equal
On 2012-05-05 05:23, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 04/19/12 11:35 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 17:56:47 +0200, Pander wrote:
Could you please apply that one already so it is of the list and we
discuss the rest below? THanks.
Please send it properly (such as with git
On 04/19/12 11:35 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 17:56:47 +0200, Pander wrote:
Could you please apply that one already so it is of the list and we
discuss the rest below? THanks.
Please send it properly (such as with git send-email) with a commit
message, and I'll do
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 04/19/12 11:35 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 17:56:47 +0200, Pander wrote:
Could you please apply that one already so it is of the list and we
discuss the rest below? THanks.
Please send it properly (such as with
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 17:56:47 +0200, Pander wrote:
Could you please apply that one already so it is of the list and we
discuss the rest below? THanks.
Please send it properly (such as with git send-email) with a commit
message, and I'll do that.
I would still argue for reverting some of
On 2012-04-09 18:21, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 13:28:17 +0200, Pander wrote:
On 2012-03-31 13:05, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 16:36:27 +0100, Pander wrote:
James, Julien, did you receive enough compelling arguments to resolve
this conflict so that o
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 13:28:17 +0200, Pander wrote:
On 2012-03-31 13:05, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 16:36:27 +0100, Pander wrote:
James, Julien, did you receive enough compelling arguments to resolve
this conflict so that o apostrophe results in ó. Then we can
On 2012-03-31 13:05, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 16:36:27 +0100, Pander wrote:
James, Julien, did you receive enough compelling arguments to resolve
this conflict so that o apostrophe results in ó. Then we can finally
close the book on gtk+/GNOME conflicts.
OK. Can you
On 2012-03-20 19:02, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 20 March 2012 17:55, Pander pan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 2012-03-20 16:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
Then let's make it consistent by only having one of the orders for new
sequences. Over time people will get the order that actually
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 23:03:44 +0100, Pander wrote:
However for ó I beg to differ. The vowels aeiou and diacritics `´'~^¯¨
are completely available in both orders. Because the are used so often,
missing out on o apostrophe will break the consistency in this
series and decrease user
On 2012-03-20 16:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 23:03:44 +0100, Pander wrote:
However for ó I beg to differ. The vowels aeiou and diacritics `´'~^¯¨
are completely available in both orders. Because the are used so often,
missing out on o apostrophe will break the
Hi,
On 20 March 2012 17:55, Pander pan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 2012-03-20 16:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
Then let's make it consistent by only having one of the orders for new
sequences. Over time people will get the order that actually works in
muscle memory, we won't have so many
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 16:32:07 +0100, Pander wrote:
On 2012-03-14 22:25, James Cloos wrote:
Nuts. I thought all of those were sorted already.
The dstroke and Dstroke lines are arguably better than the U0110 and
U0111 lines.
Since Multi_key o apostrophe a and A were already
On 2012-03-19 18:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 16:32:07 +0100, Pander wrote:
On 2012-03-14 22:25, James Cloos wrote:
Nuts. I thought all of those were sorted already.
The dstroke and Dstroke lines are arguably better than the U0110 and
U0111 lines.
Since Multi_key o
On 2012-03-19 23:03, Pander wrote:
On 2012-03-19 18:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 16:32:07 +0100, Pander wrote:
On 2012-03-14 22:25, James Cloos wrote:
Nuts. I thought all of those were sorted already.
The dstroke and Dstroke lines are arguably better than the U0110 and
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:55:53 -0700, James Cloos wrote:
nls/en_US.UTF-8/Compose.pre | 378
+++-
1 file changed, 373 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 91bcce48d94792f78333d2aea73961cc2e739d2e
Author: Pander
Nuts. I thought all of those were sorted already.
The dstroke and Dstroke lines are arguably better than the U0110 and
U0111 lines.
Since Multi_key o apostrophe a and A were already there,
the Multi_key o apostrophe entry for ó will have to go.
So I'll push this:
diff --git
Pushed as 62d4295389.
Thanks for the quick check!
(And the reminder to eternal vigilance.)
-JimC
--
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 17:33:08 -0400, James Cloos wrote:
Pushed as 62d4295389.
Thanks for the quick fix.
Thanks for the quick check!
I was looking at http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/3289/, but
it turns out the gtk+ additions stole compose O X for ¤ (why was the
lowercase version
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 14:13:57 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
include/X11/Xlib.h |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
New commits:
commit f2651e03f3295a453a2965c3749bc8b6e66f1c09
Author: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Date: Mon Oct 10 14:09:17 2011 -0700
Mark
On Oct 10, 2011, at 15:31, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 14:13:57 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
include/X11/Xlib.h |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
New commits:
commit f2651e03f3295a453a2965c3749bc8b6e66f1c09
Author: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Date:
There's been quite a bit of code churn in libX11, and I want to get Jamey's
fixes out. If nobody yells at me not to in the next half hour or so, I'm going
to tag/push an updated libX11 tag (1.4.2).
Thanks for those changes Jamey.
--Jeremy
On Mar 15, 2011, at 16:57, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On 03/17/11 04:09 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
There's been quite a bit of code churn in libX11, and I want to get Jamey's
fixes out. If nobody yells at me not to in the next half hour or so, I'm
going to tag/push an updated libX11 tag (1.4.2).
Yeah, between those and all the static
26 matches
Mail list logo
