After applying this series, there aren't many uses of MAXSCREENS left.
Keith's fix-private-usage branch deals with one of the per-screen
private key arrays, and probably illustrates how to handle the other.
Most of the other cases are pretty easy to deal with. The obnoxious
cases are PanoramiXRes.i
Hey Jamey,
I took a look on this series. Comments are bellow.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 01:22:06AM +0200, ext Jamey Sharp wrote:
> After applying this series, there aren't many uses of MAXSCREENS left.
> Keith's fix-private-usage branch deals with one of the per-screen
> private key arrays, and pr
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> And I wouldn't care about dummy video driver being broken, really - let's
> squash it and void input driver within the server and delete xvfb. But other
> conservative guys might have different opinions here.
Certainly those who build on platforms that the XFree86 DDX isn'
Le 01/06/2010 19:39, Tiago Vignatti a écrit :
> And I wouldn't care about dummy video driver being broken, really - let's
> squash it and void input driver within the server and delete xvfb. But other
> conservative guys might have different opinions here.
Please don't take out Xvfb, it's a good
Thanks for reviewing, Tiago! I'd like to address the Xvfb questions
first before getting to your review comments...
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:39:35PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> And I wouldn't care about dummy video driver being broken, really - let's
> squash it and void input driver within t
Jamey Sharp wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing, Tiago! I'd like to address the Xvfb questions
> first before getting to your review comments...
>
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:39:35PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
>> And I wouldn't care about dummy video driver being broken, really - let's
>> squash it a
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:15:30AM -0700, Jamey Sharp wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing, Tiago! I'd like to address the Xvfb questions
> first before getting to your review comments...
>
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:39:35PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> > And I wouldn't care about dummy video driver
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 08:15:30PM +0200, ext Jamey Sharp wrote:
>
> So, yes. I think I'd like to see the xfree86 DDX made usable on all
> platforms that have active maintainers; in parallel, factor out common
> code between Xvfb/Xfake/dummy and between Xnest/Xephyr/Xdmx; and
> finally, unify
