Re: Requiring newer autoconf for X.Org packages?

2022-08-31 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 8/31/22 01:08, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 02:42:39PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: The easy solution is to use autoconf 2.70 or newer, since that release added _OPENBSD_SOURCE to the defines added by AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS:

Re: Requiring newer autoconf for X.Org packages?

2022-08-31 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 22:42, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > We document autoconf 2.62 as the minimum release required in: > https://www.x.org/wiki/Building_the_X_Window_System/ > and most modules have AC_PREREQ([2.60]). If I recall correctly, a decade > ago > we didn't want to force use of

Re: Requiring newer autoconf for X.Org packages?

2022-08-31 Thread Povilas Kanapickas
On 2022-08-31 00:42, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Thomas Klausner & I have been having an off-list discussion about a problem > he had building some X.Org packages for NetBSD. > > For historical reasons, the NetBSD headers hide the prototype for > reallocarray() > behind #ifdef _OPENBSD_SOURCE -

Re: Requiring newer autoconf for X.Org packages?

2022-08-31 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 02:42:39PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > The easy solution is to use autoconf 2.70 or newer, since that release added > _OPENBSD_SOURCE to the defines added by AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS: > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/autoconf.git/commit/?id=c467efab94cd2d0331655