On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 09:52:11 +0100
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 09:45:51PM +0100, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
> > I'm continuing my review and I'm now looking at libxcb and xcbproto.
> >
> > Is there a goal set to switch from auto* tools to meson/ninja for the
> > maximum of
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:52:11AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 09:45:51PM +0100, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
> > I'm continuing my review and I'm now looking at libxcb and xcbproto.
> >
> > Is there a goal set to switch from auto* tools to meson/ninja for the
> >
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 09:45:51PM +0100, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
> I'm continuing my review and I'm now looking at libxcb and xcbproto.
>
> Is there a goal set to switch from auto* tools to meson/ninja for the
> maximum of projects?
>
> Since I have to untangle things for my own built
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 01:36:56PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 2/5/24 12:45, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
> > I'm continuing my review and I'm now looking at libxcb and xcbproto.
> >
> > Is there a goal set to switch from auto* tools to meson/ninja for the
> > maximum of projects?
>
> Yes
On 2/5/24 12:45, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
I'm continuing my review and I'm now looking at libxcb and xcbproto.
Is there a goal set to switch from auto* tools to meson/ninja for the
maximum of projects?
Yes - that's our overall direction, but progress is going slowly. There
is some though -
I'm continuing my review and I'm now looking at libxcb and xcbproto.
Is there a goal set to switch from auto* tools to meson/ninja for the
maximum of projects?
Since I have to untangle things for my own built framework, I may as
well provide meson files (that are undoubtely more readable than
