On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:12:05PM +0200, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> That's what fast cpus are for :-). Though I agree in particular the
really:-) ?
VDR was designed with the goal in mind to also support very slow CPUs
like 600Mhz Pentiums and slower. So the use of so called full featured
cards (
On 30.07.2008 21:17, Thomas Hilber wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 04:17:10PM +0200, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> Actually, this is a very interesting patch. I've been thinking
>> about this a bit lately. How much jerkyness do you actually get
>> when it's not synchronized? I'd assume that if you
ah, maybe I now found something:
register RADEON_CRTC_VLINE_CRNT_VLINE
alternatively counts from
0 - 624and from
0 - 622the next time.
probably I can derive the field polarity from this?
Cheers
Thomas
___
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
xorg-
Hi list,
sorry if this has been answered elsewhere but I haven't found a solution yet.
In my project
http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/2008-July/017347.html
after starting the Xserver VBLANK interrupts are generated every 20ms.
This is because I use a 50Hz interlaced modeline.
To yield synchro
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 04:17:10PM +0200, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Actually, this is a very interesting patch. I've been thinking about
> this a bit lately. How much jerkyness do you actually get when it's not
> synchronized? I'd assume that if you use an output mode which is as
it depends on v
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16888
--- Comment #26 from BogDan Vatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-30 11:16:44 PST
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (From update of attachment 17968 [details])
> please attach files as text/plain
>
Sorry I didn't see you post (and this option) un
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16888
--- Comment #25 from BogDan Vatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-30 11:12:33 PST
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> does you bios have any options for remapping memory?
No.
> Also are you on 32-bit or
> 64-bit?
>
64
--
Configure bugmail: h
On 29.07.2008 20:43, Thomas Hilber wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:23:09PM +0200, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> That's true but last I heard CRT TVs are a dying breed.
>
> who cares:)
>
>> Ok, I see your point. But if your output device is a projector, LCD (not
>> sure about plasma right now)
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16888
--- Comment #24 from BogDan Vatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-30 04:59:13 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=17998)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=17998)
Xorg.0.log (1024x768 screen res) radeon driver compiled from git
-
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16888
--- Comment #23 from BogDan Vatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-30 04:54:49 PST
---
I compile radeon driver from git and has the same effect.
I even try with 1024x176 resolution.
I
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16888
--- Comment #22 from BogDan Vatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-30 04:03:36 PST
---
(In reply to comment #18)
> The radeonhd driver in Debian experimental does not contain the code to fix
> the
> problem of bug #16263. You'll have to compile t
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16888
--- Comment #21 from BogDan Vatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-30 03:57:44 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=17996)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=17996)
Xorg.0.log with 2gb mem
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedes
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16888
--- Comment #20 from BogDan Vatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-30 03:56:54 PST
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > I can't remove my sistem is a laptop !
> > I don't know how !
>
> You can limit the amount of RAM use
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16888
--- Comment #19 from Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-30 00:26:12 PST
---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I can't remove my sistem is a laptop !
> I don't know how !
You can limit the amount of RAM used by the Linux kernel using the mem
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 22:03 +0200, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What we need is a (very precise) way to reproduce this hang. And also we
>
> In the last few days the bug appeared in a series of two or at max
> three hang
15 matches
Mail list logo
