https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35579
Bug 35579 depends on bug 43397, which changed state.
Bug 43397 Summary: EXTEND_NONE is used instead of EXTEND_PAD when src sample
area is entirely within the surface
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43397
What|Old Val
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35579
--- Comment #37 from Konstantin Svist 2011-12-05 20:38:51
PST ---
Ref. bug 43397 - claims bug is not in Cairo. Please discuss
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
Am 05.12.2011 21:51, schrieb Dave Airlie:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Roland Scheidegger
> wrote:
>> IIRC this is not only true for r200. Might be true for r300 too, and
>> r100 (possibly not rv100) even. Looks good otherwise though.
>
> Yeah I've been trying to solve it as I find it, I fou
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Roland Scheidegger
wrote:
> IIRC this is not only true for r200. Might be true for r300 too, and
> r100 (possibly not rv100) even. Looks good otherwise though.
Yeah I've been trying to solve it as I find it, I found it definitely
on rv250/rv280, r200 I'm not 100% s
IIRC this is not only true for r200. Might be true for r300 too, and
r100 (possibly not rv100) even. Looks good otherwise though.
Roland
Am 05.12.2011 19:46, schrieb Dave Airlie:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> When we do the allocations we need to make sure the always tiled
> nature is taken into acco
From: Dave Airlie
When we do the allocations we need to make sure the always tiled
nature is taken into account.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
src/radeon.h |1 +
src/radeon_dri2.c |8
src/radeon_exa.c |3 +++
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43191
--- Comment #23 from Simon Farnsworth
2011-12-05 10:32:59 PST ---
I had the kernel print the size and gpu_offset of each BO assigned to
CB_COLOR0_BASE:
$ git diff
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergree
On Sam, 2011-11-26 at 22:43 +0100, Jan Oberländer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:24:24AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Can you try if the patch below fixes this crash?
>
> Heh. I wish I could tell you. Before testing the patch I tried to
> reproduce the crash, just to make sure I could a
