https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56986
--- Comment #7 from foobar...@mailmetrash.com ---
Radeon driver hangs here. X starts but suffers intermittent segfaulting. The
machine never segfaults in terminal (without X running).
Early KMS, zero-nada-nil-no power saving or sleep stuff. That'
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54273
--- Comment #35 from Alexandre Bique ---
I'm sorry but it doesn't help :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
xorg-driver-ati@lis
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54273
Alexandre Bique changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #70134|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54273
--- Comment #33 from Alexandre Bique ---
radeon_crtc is not defined with my kernel version.
It is easier for me to apply a patch against linux-3.6.6, is it possible?
Otherwise can you tell me which kernel version I should use?
Thanks! :)
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54273
--- Comment #32 from Alexandre Bique ---
Created attachment 70134
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=70134&action=edit
possible fix linux-3.6.6
I modified the patch to apply against linux 3.6.6 (used by archlinux).
--
You are
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Don, 2012-11-15 at 10:47 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> > On Mit, 2012-11-14 at 16:26 -0500, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> From: Jerome Glisse
>> >>
>> >> This is some kind off
On Don, 2012-11-15 at 10:47 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mit, 2012-11-14 at 16:26 -0500, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Jerome Glisse
> >>
> >> This is some kind off degenerate case that we might get from time to
> >> time, just
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2012-11-14 at 16:26 -0500, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Jerome Glisse
>>
>> This is some kind off degenerate case that we might get from time to
>> time, just fallback to software when facing it.
>>
>> v2: Handle the other dege
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2012-11-14 at 12:39 -0500, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Jerome Glisse
>>
>> We might get a request for a pixmap/drawable that is too big
>> for GPU capabilities in the dri2 get buffer path. In face of
>> such things just return
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54273
--- Comment #31 from Alex Deucher ---
Created attachment 70127
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=70127&action=edit
possible fix
Does this patch help?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56503
JS changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Don, 2012-11-15 at 01:00 +0400, Igor Vagulin wrote:
>
> I tried glamor acceleration on xf86-video-ati-7.0 & mesa-9.0 &
> kernel-3.6.6.
Note that the radeonsi driver in Mesa 9.0 is very immature. Right now
you should always use latest Git for radeonsi.
> I didn't see any performance improveme
On Mit, 2012-11-14 at 16:26 -0500, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jerome Glisse
>
> This is some kind off degenerate case that we might get from time to
> time, just fallback to software when facing it.
>
> v2: Handle the other degenerate case of NULL drawable
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Glis
On Mit, 2012-11-14 at 12:39 -0500, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jerome Glisse
>
> We might get a request for a pixmap/drawable that is too big
> for GPU capabilities in the dri2 get buffer path. In face of
> such things just return NULL to dri2 get buffer request. The
> GL driver should the
Hi All,
Not sure if it is correct mail list for my question, please point me in
right direction if I am wrong.
I tried glamor acceleration on xf86-video-ati-7.0 & mesa-9.0 &
kernel-3.6.6. I didn't see any performance improvements in comparison
with modesetting and catch 2 noticeable performa
15 matches
Mail list logo
