On Mit, 2011-07-13 at 16:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
We still want to byteswap the ring itself and the IBs, so we don't touch
that but we remove
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 17:19 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mit, 2011-07-13 at 16:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
We still want to byteswap the ring
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
We still want to byteswap the ring itself and the IBs, so we don't touch
The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
We still want to byteswap the ring itself and the IBs, so we don't touch
that but we remove setting of the byteswap bits in CP_RB_RPTR_ADDR and
IH_CNTL.
In
The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
We still want to byteswap the ring itself and the IBs, so we don't touch
that but we remove setting of the byteswap bits in CP_RB_RPTR_ADDR and
IH_CNTL.
In
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:42 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
We still
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:42 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using
