On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2012-08-24 at 13:19 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > > On Don, 2012-08-23 at 18:27 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As you can see, it is intended that the "panning" dime
On Fre, 2012-08-24 at 13:19 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Don, 2012-08-23 at 18:27 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> > >
> > > As you can see, it is intended that the "panning" dimensions ought to
> > > remain at 1920x1080 so that by movi
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Don, 2012-08-23 at 18:27 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> >
> > As you can see, it is intended that the "panning" dimensions ought to
> > remain at 1920x1080 so that by moving the mouse here or there it is
> > possible to see any part of the des
On Don, 2012-08-23 at 18:27 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> As you can see, it is intended that the "panning" dimensions ought to
> remain at 1920x1080 so that by moving the mouse here or there it is
> possible to see any part of the desktop which is outside of the 800x600
> window, or, one
The first machine has in it the following on-board video:
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI
RS780 [Radeon HD 3200]
The problem with it is that mode switching does not work right.
Before giving details of what happens, let me explain that I have poor
eyesi
