Dear all,
My take on the confusion about future plans and the various branches is
as follows:
- Confusion for "users":
One should be aware that none of the people in this discussion, and
probably none of the people reading this mailing-list, are just plain
"users". A "user" is someone who mo
One thing about reliability:
I've not had xournal crash on me a lot. I think there may be once.
However, the lack of a recovery feature is concerning. If there is
recovery, crashes are less problematic.
Cheers,
Shuhao
On 11/18/2013 09:52 AM, Wilson Brenna wrote:
> I'll add that I didn't mention
I'll add that I didn't mention reliability and that I completely agree -
I've never had a crash with Denis' Xournal, it's extremely stable. The
current state of Xournalpp is that crashes are less and less common but
still occur. When I started looking at the code, there were a few bugs in
copy/past
So yeah that's what I figured as well. It seems like everyone has their
own fork.
While that seems to be beauty of opensource, this is just confusing and
bad for the end users.
There are a lot of improvements that could be made to xournal, a lot of
which are already implemented. We should really
Hi Daniel,
I think that's probably because Ubuntu 13.10 has a new version of poppler
and so it needs the addpoppler hack because newer poppler packages don't
include the header files xournalpp uses. If you checkout the addpoppler
branch and compile that, hopefully that will work (sometimes autotoo
Wilson> Xournalpp is written in C++ while Xournal is written in C :) They are
very
Wilson> different code-wise. In terms of feature sets, I'm not sure what the
Wilson> current state of Xournal is feature-wise and how far it's gone since
hi Wilson
I downloaded xournapp and tried to compile
I would like my $0.02, adding to what has been said.
Denis Auroux twisted the bytes to say:
Denis> There are basically two different things: xournal, and xournal++
Denis> (xournalpp).
Denis> Xournal was written in C using GTK2. Its code base is stable, but is
Denis> not evolving very f
