[Xpert]Re: more pci ati aiw 128 [5446] problems

2001-10-18 Thread Joseph Cheek
t i'm examining every possibility while i try to get the tv tuner working [still not 8-(]. r128 has been modprobed, as well as mga and agpgart [for the g450 primary card]. thanks! joe Mike A. Harris wrote: >On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Joseph Cheek wrote: > >>Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:25

[Xpert]Re: more pci ati aiw 128 [5446] problems

2001-10-18 Thread Joseph Cheek
128BlockHandler, I >need to take that trace out of the source :) > >On 18-Oct-01 at 19:26, Joseph Cheek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>thank you rick! it compiles [which if further than i had gotten before]! >>but it doesn't work 8-( >> >>xvinfo only shows

Re: [Xpert]Re: more pci ati aiw 128 [5446] problems

2001-10-19 Thread Joseph Cheek
thanks andrew. but i am using xinerama 8-(. Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: >On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Joseph Cheek wrote: > >>hi rick, >> >>i got it! thanks so much for your help! it works now! >> >>xv seems to pick up on the first card defined in XF86Config. so

[Xpert]4.2 -configure no longer shows Clock range: line

2002-03-14 Thread Joseph Cheek
hi all, 4.1.0 when used with a -configure opt would give me lots of output, including a nice Clock range: line. 4.2.0 doesn't do this. is there any way to get it back, or somehow otherwise find out the clock ranges? thanks! joe -- Joseph Cheek, CTO and Founder, Lycoris Redmond Linux

Re: [Xpert]4.2 -configure no longer shows Clock range: line

2002-03-18 Thread Joseph Cheek
thanks! the problem was that -verbose was turned off by default. i added -verbose 1 and it works great now! joe Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: >On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Joseph Cheek wrote: > >>hi all, >> >>4.1.0 when used with a -configure opt would give me lots of out

Re: [Xpert]4.2 -configure no longer shows Clock range: line

2002-03-18 Thread Joseph Cheek
hi, the app parses stderr - once i realized that the issue was verbosity, adding -verbose 1 was easier than changing the app to parse a logfile. thanks! joe Andy Isaacson wrote: >On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 09:06:20AM -0800, Joseph Cheek wrote: > >>thanks! the problem was that