On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Peter Magnusson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>
> >The lines. It's static. There's not enough memory bandwidth
> > to display the video at that high of pixel clocks. It's less
> > of a problem at depth 16, or if you lower the resolution.
>
> Ahh
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>The lines. It's static. There's not enough memory bandwidth
> to display the video at that high of pixel clocks. It's less
> of a problem at depth 16, or if you lower the resolution.
Ahh, okey.
How much bandwidth is needed for it to work? 300 MH
Hi,. I have this prob too, however I run a G400Max. resolution changes
can't quite get it to go away. I'm currently running @ 2048x1536-32
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 01:46, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Peter Magnusson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> >
> > >
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Peter Magnusson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>
> > If I recall correctly, the G200 is bandwidth challenged.
> > Static is expected in even moderate resolutions in depth 24.
>
> What static?
The lines. It's static. There's not enough memory b
