On Tuesday 10 December 2002 08:36 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
I attach the little bit I have on this matter (which includes your patch).
Thanks, Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
___
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Warren Turkal wrote:
A larger issue is that, on some 32-bit systems, this ends up typedef'ing
CARD32 as 'unsigned int', and on others, as 'unsigned long'. For reasons
I won't get into here, the X sources currently need CARD32 to be
typedef'ed as 'unsigned long' for
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 03:24 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
After going through that exercise, perhaps, you will have gained a greater
appreciation for what portability really means.
Thank you for the explanation. In these places that warnings are produced,
should the code call for a
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Warren Turkal wrote:
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 03:24 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
After going through that exercise, perhaps, you will have gained a greater
appreciation for what portability really means.
Thank you for the explanation. In these places that
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Warren Turkal wrote:
Here is a patch that should make Xmd.h use C99 when available.
--- /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h2002-10-16 15:14:38.0 -0500
+++ Xmd.h 2002-10-19 14:23:33.0 -0500
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
On Monday 09 December 2002 09:55 am, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
A larger issue is that, on some 32-bit systems, this ends up typedef'ing
CARD32 as 'unsigned int', and on others, as 'unsigned long'. For reasons
I won't get into here, the X sources currently need CARD32 to be
typedef'ed as
Here is a patch that should make Xmd.h use C99 when available.
--- /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h 2002-10-16 15:14:38.0 -0500
+++ Xmd.h 2002-10-19 14:23:33.0 -0500
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
**/
#ifndef XMD_H
#define
C99 has integer types that have an exact width. For instance, uint32_t is an
unsigned integer of 32 bit width. This would put the burden of making the
right width integer types on the c library as opposed to the x include. I
think that, if possible, getting rid of architecture magic in the
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Warren Turkal wrote:
Why does X not use the exact integral types in its typedefs?
For instance,
typedef uint32_t CARD32;
instead of all the magic in Xmd.h?
These are the ISO C 9X integer types aren't they ?
I don't think we have got as far as
Why does X not use the exact integral types in its typedefs?
For instance,
typedef uint32_t CARD32;
instead of all the magic in Xmd.h?
Thanks, Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
___
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the Xmd.h file, would it be okay to change the preprocessor directives to
#if define(symbol) and such?
Warren
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 03:37 am, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Warren Turkal wrote:
Why does X not use the exact integral types in its typedefs?
For
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Warren Turkal wrote:
Why does X not use the exact integral types in its typedefs?
For instance,
typedef uint32_t CARD32;
instead of all the magic in Xmd.h?
These are the ISO C 9X integer types aren't they ?
I don't think we have got as far as completely
12 matches
Mail list logo
