Phillipp, ah, that's interesting. I'm obviously making packages the "quick
and dirty" route using checkinstall, but it's still a lot better than just
flinging binaries and libs onto the filesystem without the distro knowing
much about them - also makes it easier to remove or upgrade X11rdp, if the
Yes it's a pity X11rdp can't be built just using a distro's X headers -
that'd be a nice thing to have...
The beta version of my X11rdp-o-Matic scripts now builds the X source and
X11rdp as packages using checkinstall, so check that out - I mentioned it
in a post to this list yesterday.
It also b
Hello Kevin,
thanks for your post, they provided some great introduction for me into xrdp.
Am Freitag 01 Februar 2013 08:44:35 schrieb Kevin Cave:
> The beta version of my X11rdp-o-Matic scripts now builds the X source and
> X11rdp as packages using checkinstall, so check that out - I mentioned i
Hello Kevin,
Am Freitag 01 Februar 2013 09:36:44 schrieb Kevin Cave:
> Phillipp, ah, that's interesting. I'm obviously making packages the "quick
> and dirty" route using checkinstall, but it's still a lot better than just
> flinging binaries and libs onto the filesystem without the distro knowing
Hello,
we (Univention) have a Debian package from xrdp-0.7.0~git20130113 for our own
Debian Squeeze based distribution UCS-3.1, which is available through our
AppCenter since today.
The problem with building X11rdp is that you need the source code of the X.org
server, because X11rdp reuses lar
