Re: xubuntu-restricted-extras

2007-06-18 Thread Freddy Martinez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [snip] > So, it sounds like the ndiswrapper will allow the 32-bit version of > flashplugin-nonfree to be used in 64-bit versions of Mozilla Firefox? Well not quite. nspluginwrapper (not doing wireless Jim) will do much more. [1] The link should have m

Re: xubuntu-restricted-extras

2007-06-18 Thread Jim Campbell
Gutsy. I second libxine-extracodecs as well. So, it sounds like the ndiswrapper will allow the 32-bit version of flashplugin-nonfree to be used in 64-bit versions of Mozilla Firefox? Also, did you mean that you are for in favor of "xubuntu-restricted-extras"? As Lionel mentioned above

Re: xubuntu-restricted-extras

2007-06-18 Thread Freddy Martinez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > Secondly, my only concern is what exactly will happen when trying to > > install the package on amd64? will flashplugin-nonfree simply be > > ignored or will the user get an error because there is no such package > > for amd64? The Mozilla Team (

Re: xubuntu-restricted-extras

2007-06-18 Thread Lionel Le Folgoc
Hi, vidd wrote: > Adam Miller wrote: > Lionel, > > First off, thank you for volunteering to support the maintenance of a > xubuntu-restricted-extras package. > > Secondly, my only concern is what exactly will happen when trying to > install the package on amd64? will fl

Re: xubuntu-restricted-extras

2007-06-18 Thread vidd
Adam Miller wrote: > Lionel, > > First off, thank you for volunteering to support the maintenance of a > xubuntu-restricted-extras package. > > Secondly, my only concern is what exactly will happen when trying to > install the package on amd64? will flashplugin-nonfree si

Re: xubuntu-restricted-extras

2007-06-18 Thread Adam Miller
Lionel, First off, thank you for volunteering to support the maintenance of a xubuntu-restricted-extras package. Secondly, my only concern is what exactly will happen when trying to install the package on amd64? will flashplugin-nonfree simply be ignored or will the user get an error because

Re: xubuntu-restricted-extras

2007-06-17 Thread Lionel Le Folgoc
Brian A wrote: > Can you include the multimedia codecs such as the win32 codecs, quicktime, > mp3 etc in the restricted codecs package as well? I think that it would be > much easier if you could just expect the majority of media formats to be > supported by your computer once you have installed th

Re: xubuntu-restricted-extras

2007-06-17 Thread Cody Somerville
Hi Brian, Win32 codecs and quicktime are not maintained in the Ubuntu repository (legal considerations) and hence can not be installed via this meta-package let alone one of the official ubuntu repositories. Win32 codecs, quicktime, and other packages like RealVideo can be installed via the Medi

Re: xubuntu-restricted-extras

2007-06-17 Thread Brian A
Can you include the multimedia codecs such as the win32 codecs, quicktime, mp3 etc in the restricted codecs package as well? I think that it would be much easier if you could just expect the majority of media formats to be supported by your computer once you have installed the restricted codecs. -

xubuntu-restricted-extras

2007-06-16 Thread Lionel Le Folgoc
Hi all! At the beginning of the meeting, Hobbsee told us that currently, there wasn't any xubuntu-restricted-extras package. {k,}ubuntu-restricted-extras are metapackages which depends on some commonly used package in the multiverse repository. I can take care of the maintenance of this pa