Ok, thank you very much for your tests !
--
Xfburn in Dapper cannot burn an Iso file from USB drive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120846
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Xubuntu
Team, which is subscribed to xfburn in ubuntu.
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
You can be in any folder, this command will just create a new folder
names trunk and download there the sources of xfburn. libisofs-dev is
available on my ppa, just click on the arrow near libisofs and select
there correct architecture. You can also add my ppa to your sources.list
to grab all
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 24626 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24626
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 24626
Too many repositories dynamic mmap ran out of room
--
cannot upgrade xfce
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218022
You received this bug notification
This is fixed in trunk.
** Changed in: xfburn (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
xfburn: don't want burn iso's
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107006
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Xubuntu
Team, which is subscribed to xfburn in ubuntu.
--
If you use gutsy, you can grab libisofs and libburn on my ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~jerome-guelfucci/+archive
First install all the deps needed: xfce4-dev-tools, libisofs-dev, libburn-dev,
libgtk2.0-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libxfcegui4-dev, libexo-0.3-dev,
libthunar-vfs-1-dev
I also advise to
Yes, fix committed is also very often used for this.
--
xfburn: don't want burn iso's
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107006
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Xubuntu
Team, which is subscribed to xfburn in ubuntu.
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
Could you possibly try to reproduce this xfburn from svn ? xfburn has
been updated to use modern libs, it shouldn't crash now.
** Changed in: xfburn (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Xfburn in Dapper cannot burn an Iso file from USB drive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120846
You
xfburn now has an icon in trunk, this will be fixed in the future 0.3.0.
** Changed in: xfburn (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
Some Applications menu items are missing icons
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105493
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Bug watch added: Xfce Bugzilla #4017
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017
** Also affects: xfce via
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
xfburn: don't want burn iso's
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107006
You received
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xfce4-utils
When opening the xfce about dialog from menu, one cannot see which
version of Xubuntu/Ubuntu the computer is running. There are only
informations about the current maintainers of Xfce packages.
** Affects: xfce4-utils (Ubuntu)
I created 3 notes numbered 1, 2 and 3 with xfce4-notes-plugin 1.4 from
gutsy, then installed Gauvain's package.
Now I've my three notes showing up correctly, but they are numbered 01,
02 and 03 and an empty note numbered 1 was created.
The content of notes.rc.bak :
[settings]
pos_x=519
The ODF plugin bug is bug 24195.
--
Please update to version 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Xubuntu
Team, which is subscribed to abiword in ubuntu.
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
For xscreensaver, I don't know, for me it consummes the half of what
gnome-screensaver consumes in RAM, and I'm not the only one to prefer
it in Xubuntu (I think Jim spoke about this). Again, if there are
issues with xscreensaver, file a bug and we will forward it upstream.
On Feb 11, 2008 7:55
There is no point in duplicating what is done in Xubuntu. The last
word should have been Ubuntu of course.
On Feb 11, 2008 7:30 PM, Jérôme Guelfucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did the change after writing here and having been ignored for a
couple of days.
- LOL
You modified the seeds
As I said in my first post in this thread, I'm backing a bit from
Xubuntu development. I , just to see how things evolve... I don't see
why I should do something you've never done Jani, I've read your open
development posts:
X is unmaintained, it bugs, Y is supported in Ubuntu and has more
Only Live-cds are broken.
On Feb 6, 2008 9:12 PM, Jim Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a VM test install of the most recent Xubuntu image today, and it went
just fine. I tested the alternate installer image.
I haven't run through any real test cases, but the update manager works, and
I will not contribute to Xubuntu anymore until the development team of
Xubuntu is able to do things that Jani do not want. You haven't done
anything for Xubuntu Hardy, why are you modifying the seeds ? Remeinds
me of the Gutsy development where Lionel took care of packaging, I
took care of bug
of seeds.
On Feb 5, 2008 5:58 PM, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/02/2008, Jérôme Guelfucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will not contribute to Xubuntu anymore until the development team of
Xubuntu is able to do things that Jani do not want. You haven't done
anything for Xubuntu Hardy, why
Kaspar: there are four xubuntu developpers: Lionel, Gauvain, Cody and
I. We were doing pretty wel, building a nice release. Then an ew
developper came to modify the seeds and show his high level of
contribution.
On Feb 5, 2008 6:09 PM, Kaspar Kööp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where did you get
yep, there is a leader and it's not Jani :) It's Lionel, a guy that
does something else than modifying feeds.
On Feb 5, 2008 6:17 PM, Kaspar Kööp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/02/2008, Jérôme Guelfucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kaspar: there are four xubuntu developpers: Lionel, Gauvain
like XFCE...
On Feb 5, 2008 6:24 PM, Kaspar Kööp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so how is it possible that changes are made to xubuntu release without the
acceptance of the leader? :) or where is the problem actually?
should users like me be worried?
On 05/02/2008, Jérôme Guelfucci [EMAIL
Jani
I do care about the users being happy with whatever I work on
The problem is actually that you don't work on it, and do not want to
listen to the ones that work on it.
On Feb 5, 2008 6:36 PM, Jérôme Guelfucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jani is the ex leader, but he finds it bit difficult
Xubuntu is ubuntu because it takes advantage of the kernel, udev..
work, the restricted manager, the community, the repos with very
updated stuff.
BUT what's the point in putting the same applications as in Ubuntu ?
It's only duplicting stuff, and is totally useless. It would be better
to
On Feb 5, 2008 6:47 PM, Lionel Le Folgoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jani Monoses a écrit :
projects are supposed to work. Xubuntu is not a pet project of anyone,
Then please explain why you are acting as if it is yours...
--
Lionel Le Folgoc - https://launchpad.net/~mrpouit
EEBA 555E 0CDE
No need to test, the current cds do not provide XFCE, this must be a
consequence of the move to universe...
We are investigating this.
On Feb 2, 2008 1:13 PM, Jérôme Guelfucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll download the iso this afternoon and test everything I can
tomorrow in a virtual machine
Jim,
Concerning the crash of squeeze, it's a bug in glib = 2.15 which is
being worked on, for example it works perfectly under gutsy which has
a 2.15 version of glib.
Jérôme
On Feb 1, 2008 9:15 PM, Stefan Schwarzburg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm not an Xubuntu developer, just an
One point is of course performance, why would we provide such detailed
benchmark ??? I don't remember anybody having done that in the Xubuntu
Team, and I wonder if other teams do so. But if you have some time to
provide all those informations, please do :)
The other point is that those
If I'm right, this has already been done.
Bye.
On Jan 31, 2008 2:56 PM, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
Having just finished reading an article about Transmission becoming Ubuntu's
default BitTorrent client, I wondered whether it could also be added to
Xubuntu. Transmission is
This has been discussed between the active members of the Xubuntu
Team. Answers to your various questions:
- we don't have special patches for this, patches have already been
pushed upstream and we are just using different build options.
- if we find the time to maintain it, why should you all
shows me that most of
those posts become ~ a XFCE/GNOME flamewar.
If you have some particular wishes, don't hesitate to file a bug
report/blueprint.
Jérôme
On Jan 31, 2008 5:20 PM, Jani Monoses [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jérôme Guelfucci wrote:
This has been discussed between the active members
annoying application is
Firefox 2 but Firefox 3 should be released on time and should be
really better.
On Jan 31, 2008 6:04 PM, Jani Monoses [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jérôme Guelfucci wrote:
I know I've not been very diplomatic. Well the point is that this
mailing list DOESN'T represent
I've discussed this a bit with Lionel, everything highy depends on
whether we are demoted to universe or not. If we are demoted to
universe this opens a lot of possibilities: vlc, audacious... If we
keep totem, I personnaly prefer totem-xine as it plays dvds correctly
once libdvdcss2 is installed.
32 matches
Mail list logo
