Re: [xubuntu-users] Viber on 32 bit Architecture

P.S. I found one Viber's version that is 32 bit. It’s for win xp. The Viber's version number is 9.5.0.8. I hope Wine will be able to process this installer now! From: Klaipedaville on Google Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 06:17 To: Xubuntu Support and User Discussions Subject: Re:

Re: [xubuntu-users] Viber on 32 bit Architecture

Also, Wine is also limited to the instruction sets you CPU supports. It can't magically make your CPU support 64 bit instructions if it's a 32 bit CPU. No software can overcome that hardware limitation. On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 7:11 AM lefty wrote: > On 09/13/2018 01:09 AM, Klaipedaville on Google

Re: [xubuntu-users] Viber on 32 bit Architecture

On 09/13/2018 01:09 AM, Klaipedaville on Google wrote: Right. Thank you. However, that’s exactly what this wine (www.winehq.org ) is for as far as I understand. Their software is supposed to run any windows’ program not 'any', though. Many. They have data on

Re: [xubuntu-users] Viber on 32 bit Architecture

On 12/09/18 23:30, Klaipedaville on Google wrote: > Hello List, >   > Does anyone know if there are any work arounds to run Viber that has > always been 64 bits on 32 bits machines? >   > I have Xubuntu 18.04 running on my 32 bit machine. I tried to use > different versions of Wine (www.winehq.org

[xubuntu-users] start a video call from the command line to a specific contact with Viber, Ring or Linphone (64 bit Xubuntu 18.04)

Hi, With Ekiga it is possible to start a video call form bash using 'Ekiga -c xxx.yy...@ekiga.net. This starts the GUI and activates the call. (It used to be possible with Skype too, adding userid/password + call contact. I used this for an application for elderly people that cannot use a mouse

Re: [xubuntu-users] Viber on 32 bit Architecture

Wine never promises to run anything Windows. There are programs that won't run with Wine. Check the link below -- there's an app database where you can research whether your app will run. On 09/12/2018 10:09 PM, Klaipedaville on Google wrote: Right. Thank you. However, that’s exactly what