Re: [Yade-dev] [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2018-12-18 Thread Jan Stránský
>> I like my point of view very much :-) ... > No luck then. :( it was just explanation why I did the answer. In general I agree with both options, just wanted to "defend" my approach. I also think we come to philosophy area in many places here :-) especially because finally one arrives to the sam

[Yade-dev] buildbot warnings in Yade on yade-full

2018-12-18 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a problem in the build on builder yade-full while building yade. Full details are available at: https://yade-dem.org/buildbot/builders/yade-full/builds/4975 Buildbot URL: https://yade-dem.org/buildbot/ Buildslave for this Build: r0calcul9 Build Reason: scheduler Build

Re: [Yade-dev] [Yade-users] [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity

2018-12-18 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Le mar. 18 déc. 2018 16:37, Jan Stránský a écrit : > > > see my previous (slightly modified): > - assuming the particles rigid > - computing the force under assumption that in reality there would be no > overlap and some deformation. > This is self contradictory, no? What would be a model where

[Yade-dev] buildbot warnings in Yade on yade-full

2018-12-18 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a problem in the build on builder yade-full while building Yade. Full details are available at: https://yade-dem.org/buildbot/builders/yade-full/builds/4976 Buildbot URL: https://yade-dem.org/buildbot/ Buildslave for this Build: r0calcul9 Build Reason: The Nightly sch