Hello,
Thank you for detailed reply. Indeed, I understand the periodic annulus
does not need to be zero-based in principle. I'll consider removing the
clamping (after triple-checking that it is effectively harmless... it
was hard enough to spot the bug previously).
On 06/01/2017 05:30 PM,
> Hello Vaclav (Hi yade-devs),
> I was wondering one thing when I checked again the periodic sorting.
> I realized that there was a possibility for all bounds to have a
> drift toward larger and larger positive values (not sure how it is in
> Woo, I'm speaking of your implementation in yade).
>
2 matches
Mail list logo
