Hello Janek,
thanks for the fix! I have checked it and it really resolves the problem
with the newer CGAL. I will reactivate CGAL-function for the
Debian-build again.
Regards
Anton
Am Mo., 7. Jan. 2019 um 13:44 Uhr schrieb Janek Kozicki :
>
> Bruno Chareyre said: (by the date of Sun, 6 Jan
I forgot to answer the test coverage question: no, move() is not covered by
any test, even indirectly.
The function is not used in other parts of the code currently.
B
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 13:44, Bruno Chareyre
wrote:
> Hi Janek,
> I think that was the right fix, thanks.
> Note that yade is
Hi Janek,
I think that was the right fix, thanks.
Note that yade is not using the periodic triangulation implemented in CGAL
[1] so there is no question on that point afaik.
Bruno
[1] that's because yade included periodicity years before cgal. I actually
implemented a periodicity based on cgal's
It appears that this function move_point(…) had long been deprecated.
I guess that's got something to do with previous modifications where we
had to use weighted points differently.
I propose to modify this line into calling move(…) instead.
This isn't change like the previous one where the C++
I'm looking into this.
On 4 Dec 2018, 23:42 +0100, Anton Gladky , wrote:
> Dear Yade developers,
>
> Yade fails to compile against newest CGAL_4,13,
> The corresponding bug on Debian tracker is [#911685].
>
> [#911685] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911685
>
> Some relevant
Dear Yade developers,
Yade fails to compile against newest CGAL_4,13,
The corresponding bug on Debian tracker is [#911685].
[#911685] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911685
Some relevant lines are here.
===
CGT::SimpleVertexInfo, CGT::SimpleCellInfo>;
6 matches
Mail list logo
