Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

2013-05-15 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Status: Open = Answered Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: What is the reason to consider 2000J is high? What is the elastic energy? The script you are showing looks familiar... :) Please

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

2013-05-15 Thread Nguyen N.G. Hien
Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Nguyen N.G. Hien posted a new comment: Hello Bruno, thanks for your attention. 'What is the reason to consider 2000J is high?' Because in order to have the quasi-static state + isotropic state, I was told that

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

2013-05-15 Thread Nguyen N.G. Hien
Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Nguyen N.G. Hien posted a new comment: Sorry the last statement is not exact. max_vel=2 and max_vel0.5 are in two different simulations, not 'after that'. -- You received this question notification because you

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228820]: question about the particle shape

2013-05-15 Thread jimtianxi
Question #228820 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228820 Status: Answered = Open jimtianxi is still having a problem: That's true! Thank you!! At 2013-05-15 13:41:32,Anton Gladky question228...@answers.launchpad.net wrote: Your question #228820 on Yade

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

2013-05-15 Thread Chiara Modenese
Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Chiara Modenese proposed the following answer: Hi, Just a small comment on what you want to achieve rather than how. I agree with Bruno saying that kinetic energy alone (however small in absolute value) will

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

2013-05-15 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: I was told that Ec (kinetic energy must be lower than 10E-7J) This is really questionable. A consistent criterion should be non- dimensional. what you are

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

2013-05-15 Thread Nguyen N.G. Hien
Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Status: Answered = Solved Nguyen N.G. Hien confirmed that the question is solved: @Chiara: Well I figured something important from your advice. In fact I'm using the unbalancedForce parameter to validate

[Yade-users] [Question #228938]: Warning

2013-05-15 Thread pingyang.1...@163.com
New question #228938 on Yade: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228938 Hi, teachers I was doing the cylinder triaxial test simulation, displayFutureWarning: The default behavior will change; specify returnSpherePack=True for the new behavior, and False to get rid of this warning

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228938]: Warning

2013-05-15 Thread Jan Stránský
Question #228938 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228938 Status: Open = Answered Jan Stránský proposed the following answer: Hello, please always, with a question, post also minimal working script reproducing your problem. see [1], in this case I would say the

[Yade-users] [Question #228967]: YADE meeting at Powders and Grains 2013?

2013-05-15 Thread Bruno Chareyre
New question #228967 on Yade: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228967 Hi there, I noticed a few members of this mailing list will present papers at PG in Sydney. Maybe a few others are not in the program but will attend the conference. It would be nice to plan a meeting. Would you