Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670453]: yadedaily- broken packages

2018-12-03 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #670453 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670453 Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment: > Any other option else than reinstalling Linux? It was just a joke in #6... sorry. Don't reinstall linux to fix a problem, never. -- You received this question notificatio

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670453]: yadedaily- broken packages

2018-12-03 Thread Manfred Hampl
Question #670453 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670453 Manfred Hampl posted a new comment: @mohsen: Please do not piggyback on somebody else's question, but create a question document of your own. If possible add the output of the commands listed in the first respon

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE

2018-12-03 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #676507 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507 Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: > That meant if in YADE we don`t have polyhedral particles, what is described in these links? I don't understand why you claim there are no polyhedral particles in Y

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #670453]: yadedaily- broken packages

2018-12-03 Thread mohsen
Question #670453 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670453 mohsen posted a new comment: Hi every one I encountered the same problem, However in Ubuntu 16.04. Any other option else than reinstalling Linux? -- You received this question notification because your team yad

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE

2018-12-03 Thread Mahdeyeh
Question #676507 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507 Mahdeyeh posted a new comment: Hi Bruno thank you, I hadn`t seen your first message. > do not "rewrite history" by editing thread titles and question descriptions. > the original question (now erased, pl

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE

2018-12-03 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #676507 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507 Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment: > What is this? The first is an hyperlink to yade's documentation. The second alike. The third suggests a journal paper. What was your question? The PFacets I was mentionni

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE

2018-12-03 Thread Mahdeyeh
Question #676507 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507 Mahdeyeh posted a new comment: I am sorry but I was n`t convinced. I hope to find a little light. What is this? : https://yade-dem.org/doc/yade.polyhedra_utils.html?highlight=polyhedra#module-yade._polyhedra_uti

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE

2018-12-03 Thread Bruno Chareyre
Question #676507 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507 Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: Hi, I believe PFacets would work with cohesive interactions and paving a volume with tetrahedra as in Taghavi & Pierce implies no special difficulty. Of course it wou

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE

2018-12-03 Thread Robert Caulk
Question #676507 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507 Robert Caulk proposed the following answer: Please do not "rewrite history" by editing thread titles and question descriptions. -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answ

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676507]: what are the differences of YADE with PFC version 6 in simulating?

2018-12-03 Thread Robert Caulk
Question #676507 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507 Robert Caulk proposed the following answer: Currently, I don't believe there is a cohesive angular block package in Yade as you describe. But Yade is designed in a way that enables the addition of such a package

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676528]: Experimental behaviour is different from simulated one

2018-12-03 Thread Luca Strobino
Question #676528 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676528 Status: Answered => Open Luca Strobino is still having a problem: Thank you so much, I'm running some tests in order to understand if setting damping = 0 there are significant changes. I'll let you know. --

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE

2018-12-03 Thread Mahdeyeh
Question #676507 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507 Summary changed to: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE Description changed to: Hi there For gravity material flow in underground mine (not fluid at all). Does YADE have the

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #676528]: Experimental behaviour is different from simulated one

2018-12-03 Thread Jan Stránský
Question #676528 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676528 Status: Open => Answered Jan Stránský proposed the following answer: > I thought that if I don't insert damping in "NewtonIntegrator" it is set to 0, I'm i right or it's necessary to explicitly set it to 0?