Question #676621 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676621
Status: Answered => Solved
De zhang confirmed that the question is solved:
Hi Bruno，
Thanks~ I checked the script and found I missed the 'O.material.append()'.
After adding that, it worked. Thanks again.
Question #676621 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676621
De zhang confirmed that the question is solved:
Thanks Bruno Chareyre, that solved my question.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.
Question #676609 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676609
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Son,
You script runs smoothly after a change [1] in the source code.
yadedaily should be updated soon.
Bruno
[1]
Question #676621 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676621
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
>Undefined or ambiguous IPhys dispatch for types FrictMat and
PolyhedraMat
Hi
You are mixing two different material types and you
New question #676621 on Yade:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676621
Hi everyone,
I did a dem-fem surface couplering base on the updated code of Jan Stranský
surf-example and modified.
Here is the code git: https://github.com/Dez2018/dez.git
I first ran the 'yade-preproc.py' to
Dear Yade users,
This is to let you know that the building of daily packages is back to
normal [1].
Ubuntu 18.04 ""Bionic is now included in the supported distributions.
Happy yading.
Bruno
http://yade-dem.org/packages/
--
___
Bruno Chareyre
Associate Professor
ENSE³ - Grenoble
Question #676451 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676451
Status: Answered => Open
Andrea Plati is still having a problem:
Sorry for the late but i was far away from the office.
This is my analysis for the total time involved to perform the same
simulation (both
Question #676609 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676609
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi Son,
As Jerome suggests the apparent contradiction is because the interaction exists
in a virtual state: detected by collider, not
Question #676609 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676609
Son Pham Thai confirmed that the question is solved:
Thanks Bruno Chareyre, that solved my question.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.
Question #676609 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676609
Status: Answered => Solved
Son Pham Thai confirmed that the question is solved:
Hi Jérôme,
Thank you for your response.
O.interactions[39,18] returns this:
I am reading about this real and
Question #676609 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676609
Jérôme Duriez posted a new comment:
Hi,
Computers are always right: if YADE says "Interaction already exists",
the interaction most certainly exists.
A possible scenario explaining why you can not detect this
New question #676609 on Yade:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676609
Hi all,
When I used createInteraction() command to manually create intrs between 2
spheres, I got an error:
RuntimeError: Interaction #39+#18 already exists.
I have then check these 2 spheres #39 and #18:
Question #676507 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507
Summary changed to:
what are the differences of YADE with PFC version 6 in simulating?
Description changed to:
Hi there
I know that PFC version 6 has the capability of simulating angular rigid
blocks. This is
Question #676507 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507
Status: Answered => Solved
Mahdeyeh confirmed that the question is solved:
Thanks Bruno Chareyre, that solved my question.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an
14 matches
Mail list logo
