Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Nguyen N.G. Hien confirmed that the question is solved: Thanks Bruno Chareyre, that solved my question. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of yade-users, which is an answer cont

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Status: Answered => Solved Nguyen N.G. Hien confirmed that the question is solved: @Chiara: Well I figured something important from your advice. In fact I'm using the unbalancedForce parameter to validate th

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: > I was told that Ec (kinetic energy must be lower than 10E-7J) This is really questionable. A consistent criterion should be non- dimensional. >what you are meanin

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Chiara Modenese proposed the following answer: Hi, Just a small comment on what you want to achieve rather than how. I agree with Bruno saying that kinetic energy alone (however small in absolute value) will not

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Nguyen N.G. Hien posted a new comment: Sorry the last statement is not exact. max_vel=2 and max_vel0.5 are in two different simulations, not 'after that'. -- You received this question notification because you

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Nguyen N.G. Hien posted a new comment: Hello Bruno, thanks for your attention. 'What is the reason to consider 2000J is "high"?' Because in order to have the quasi-static state + isotropic state, I was told that

Re: [Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

Question #228886 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Status: Open => Answered Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: What is the reason to consider 2000J is "high"? What is the elastic energy? The script you are showing looks familiar... :) Please expl

[Yade-users] [Question #228886]: [Triaxial test] Kinetic Energy is way too big, how to reduce it?

New question #228886 on Yade: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/228886 Hello Yade Devs and Users, I'm modelling a triaxial test and here is my code: http://pastebin.com/94dxzCbQ Briefly, the triaxial test that I'm simulating passes these steps: - Create the cloud of particles - Compre