Question #404455 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/404455
feda posted a new comment:
Thank you for your suggestions and comments:
-using the restitution coefficient instead of cn and cs doesn't change the
result.
-decreasing the maximum strain rate of periodic cell doe
Question #404455 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/404455
Status: Answered => Solved
feda confirmed that the question is solved:
Thanks Jérôme Duriez, that solved my question.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer co
Question #404455 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/404455
Anton Gladky proposed the following answer:
Another option is to use restituion coefficient instead
of direct setting of cn and cs parameters.
Best regards
Anton
--
You received this question notification bec
Question #404455 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/404455
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
The porosity at equilibrium is not single valued, it is a range of possible
porosities. Which one is reached along a particular loading path depends on
every possib
Question #404455 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/404455
Status: Open => Answered
Jérôme Duriez proposed the following answer:
Hi,
I think you should choose what is the "best" method according to your
goal only.
If your goal is to have the loosest possible state
New question #404455 on Yade:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/404455
Hello,
I am simulating a periodic isotropic compression of well graded material (Cu>3)
to reach the stable loosest state (target porosity).
I use ViscElMat to define the material (Kn,Ks,cn,cs,frictionangle,density):
6 matches
Mail list logo
