Question #693898 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/693898
David Alber confirmed that the question is solved:
Thanks Luc Scholtès, that solved my question.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.
Question #693898 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/693898
Status: Answered => Solved
David Alber confirmed that the question is solved:
Dear Luc Scholtes and YADE community,
This helps a lot. Thanks for the great support!
--
You received this question
Question #693898 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/693898
Status: Open => Answered
Luc Scholtès proposed the following answer:
Hi David,
"What constitutive law would you recommend to achieve these cohesive
bonds?"
You can use the JCFPM. All interactions (onJoint
Question #693898 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/693898
Status: Answered => Open
David Alber is still having a problem:
@Jerome Duriez:
1)
Thanks for your answer. Having a closer look at the example of the workflow,
provided the answers I needed. It seems that
Question #693898 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/693898
Luc Scholtès proposed the following answer:
Alright,
For 1), as suggested by Jerome, if you want to modify an existing
interaction stiffness, you need to add
i.phys.kn=valueYouWant
in your loop
#Set sphere
Question #693898 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/693898
Status: Open => Answered
Jérôme Duriez proposed the following answer:
Hi
1) After a quick look, problem seems to be that your interaction has
already be assigned its mechanical properties (like phys.kn),
Question #693898 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/693898
Status: Answered => Open
David Alber is still having a problem:
Dear Luc,
1)
I would have expected that. However, even if manually setting the interaction
'isOnJoint', the force between the two spheres is
Question #693898 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/693898
Status: Open => Answered
Luc Scholtès proposed the following answer:
Hi David,
1) no Hertz Mindlin contact force in JCFPM: stiffnesses are constant (linear
force displacement law). The way these
Question #693898 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/693898
Description changed to:
Dear Yade community,
being new to yade I lack some basic understanding about the constitutitve law
‘Law2_ScGeom_JCFpmPhys_JointedCohesiveFrictionalPM’ and related JCFpmMat,
New question #693898 on Yade:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/693898
Dear Yade community,
being new to yade I lack some basic understanding about the constitutitve law
‘Law2_ScGeom_JCFpmPhys_JointedCohesiveFrictionalPM’ and related JCFpmMat,
Ip2_JCFpmMat_JCFpmMat_JCFpmPhys classes:
10 matches
Mail list logo
