Public bug reported: hi,
Today neutron supports quota on floating IPs, but for private clouds the use cases for shared provider networks are increasing. In this area neutron offers no quota mechanism as far as i can tell, and it is quite painful since we cannot prevent any project from consuming the whole provider network. Ideally we would like to have a much more granular quota system that can handle limits per network, not just a total summary. Private clouds tend to have many external/shared networks in different security zones in the enterprise. - Floating IP quota per external network. - IP/ports quota per shared provider network. br, bjolo ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756270 Title: quota on shared provider networks Status in neutron: New Bug description: hi, Today neutron supports quota on floating IPs, but for private clouds the use cases for shared provider networks are increasing. In this area neutron offers no quota mechanism as far as i can tell, and it is quite painful since we cannot prevent any project from consuming the whole provider network. Ideally we would like to have a much more granular quota system that can handle limits per network, not just a total summary. Private clouds tend to have many external/shared networks in different security zones in the enterprise. - Floating IP quota per external network. - IP/ports quota per shared provider network. br, bjolo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1756270/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp