With 18 +1s (8 binding) and no -1s the vote passes.
Thanks to all who verified and voted on the release.
I'll get the bits out within the next couple of days.
thanks,
Arun
On Feb 6, 2013, at 7:59 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.3-alp
+1 (non-binding) Built from source on Ubuntu and ran a couple different
jobs under the fair scheduler.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:44PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > We've created BigTop stack with 2.0.3 as the base. Ran YCSB, slive, a
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified checksums and signatures on src and binary tarballs
- Built from source
- Deployed pseudo-distributed cluster and ran some example jobs
Jason
On 02/06/2013 09:59 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Folks,
I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.3-alpha that I wo
I do see that the commons-daemon dependency is still at 1.0.3. This
particular version has a busted group id (POM says "org.apache.commons"
when the maven coordinates say "commons-daemon"), and it causes havoc with
some builds when this dependency is included.
Could you please update the commons-d
+1 (non-binding)
I've downloaded hadoop-2.0.3-alpha.tar.gz, and deployed it on EC2, Rhel
5.8. It's a 5-node cluster (i.e., 1 master, 4 slaves). I've tried the
examples, and no failures occurred.
Thanks,
Zhijie
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:07 PM, lohit wrote:
> +1
> Deployed on more than 100 nodes
+1
Deployed on more than 100 nodes.
Ran 30TB teragen/terasort. Will run few more over the weekend to test
scheduler.
Things looks stable. I do see few failures, but those I believe are
hardware problems.
Thanks,
@lohitvijayarenu
2013/2/8 Konstantin Boudnik
> The issue with the configuration is
+1 (binding)
I downloaded the src tar ball, built it with the native bits enabled,
started up a little cluster, and ran some sample jobs. Things worked as
expected. I also verified the signatures on the source artifact.
I did bump into one little issue, but I don't think it should be considered
a
+1 (non-binding)
Downloaded ( verified checksums ) and built from source, deployed and
successfully ran both MR and distributed shell examples.
-- Hitesh
On Feb 6, 2013, at 7:59 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.3-alpha that I would
+1 non-binding
I downloaded hadoop-2.0.3-alpha.tar.gz and verified the checksum and
signature. I deployed to a set of Ubuntu VMs: NN, RM, 2*DN/NM, and 2NN. I
tested a few HDFS operations and MapReduce jobs. I verified that the 2NN
could complete a checkpoint.
Thank you,
--Chris
On Thu, Feb 7
+1 (binding). I downloaded it, verified checksums, built from source,
installed (both binary and one I built) and ran some basic jobs.
Tom
On 2/6/13 9:59 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote:
>Folks,
>
>I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.3-alpha that I
>would like to release.
>
>This
Verified the tarball checksums. Ran a couple example jobs on a 3 node
cluster successfully, with the same WARN caveat as Bobby.
+1 (non-binding).
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Robert Evans wrote:
> I downloaded the binary package and ran a few example jobs on a 3 node
> cluster. Everything se
I downloaded the binary package and ran a few example jobs on a 3 node
cluster. Everything seems to be working OK on it, I did see
WARN util.NativeCodeLoader: Unable to load native-hadoop library for your
platform... using builtin-java classes where applicable
For every shell command, but just l
Folks,
I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.3-alpha that I would like
to release.
This release contains several major enhancements such as QJM for HDFS HA,
multi-resource scheduling for YARN, YARN ResourceManager restart etc.
Also YARN has achieved significant stability at sc
13 matches
Mail list logo
