Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-12-08 Thread Andrew Wang
FYI that we got our last blocker in today, so I'm currently rolling RC1. Stay tuned! On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > On Nov 30, 2017, at 1:07 AM, Rohith Sharma K S < > rohithsharm...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > >. If ATSv1 isn’t replaced by ATSv2, then why is it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-30 Thread Allen Wittenauer
> On Nov 30, 2017, at 1:07 AM, Rohith Sharma K S > wrote: > > > >. If ATSv1 isn’t replaced by ATSv2, then why is it marked deprecated? > Ideally it should not be. Can you point out where it is marked as deprecated? > If it is in historyserver daemon start, that change made very long back when

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-30 Thread Rohith Sharma K S
Hi Vinod/Allen bq. We need to figure out if this V1 TimelineService should even be support given ATSv2. ATSv2 is in alpha phase. We should continue to support Timeline Service V1 till we have the detailed entity level ACLs in V2. And also there are proposal to upgrade/migration paths from TSv1 to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-25 Thread Allen Wittenauer
> On Nov 21, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > wrote: > >>> - $HADOOP_YARN_HOME/sbin/yarn-daemon.sh start historyserver doesn't even >>> work. Not just deprecated in favor of timelineserver as was advertised. >> >> This works for me in trunk and the bash code doesn’t appear to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-22 Thread Brahma Reddy Battula
bq. (a) The behavior of this command. Clearly, it will conflict with the MapReduce JHS - only one of them can be started on the same node. Yes,Since the PID file will be same. This problem will not present in branch-2.9 + as pid file will be suffix with mapred(for JHS)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-21 Thread Andrew Wang
Hi folks, Thanks again for the testing help with the RC. Here's our dashboard for the 3.0.0 release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12329849 Right now we're tracking three blockers: * HADOOP-15058 is the create-release fix, I just put up a patch which needs re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-21 Thread Vrushali C
Hi Vinod, bq. (b) We need to figure out if this V1 TimelineService should even be support given ATSv2. Yes, I am following this discussion. Let me chat with Rohith and Varun about this and we will respond on this thread. As such, my preliminary thoughts are that we should continue to support Time

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-21 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>> - $HADOOP_YARN_HOME/sbin/yarn-daemon.sh start historyserver doesn't even >> work. Not just deprecated in favor of timelineserver as was advertised. > > This works for me in trunk and the bash code doesn’t appear to have > changed in a very long time. Probably something local to your in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-21 Thread Junping Du
-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0 >>> - Cannot enable new UI in YARN because it is under a non-default >>> compilation flag. It should be on by default. >>> >> >> The yarn-ui profile has always been off by default, AFAIK. It's doc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-21 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>>> - Cannot enable new UI in YARN because it is under a non-default >>> compilation flag. It should be on by default. >>> >> >> The yarn-ui profile has always been off by default, AFAIK. It's documented >> to turn it on in BUILDING.txt for release builds, and we do it in >> create-release. >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-21 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>> - One decommissioned node in YARN ResourceManager UI always appears to >> start with, even when there are no NodeManagers that are started yet: >> Info :-1, DECOMMISSIONED, null rack. It shows up only in the UI though, >> not in the CLI node -list >> > > Is this a blocker? Could we get a JIRA?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-21 Thread Andrew Wang
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > The original release script and instructions broke the build up > into three or so steps. When I rewrote it, I kept that same model. It’s > probably time to re-think that. In particular, it should probably be one > big step th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Allen Wittenauer
The original release script and instructions broke the build up into three or so steps. When I rewrote it, I kept that same model. It’s probably time to re-think that. In particular, it should probably be one big step that even does the maven deploy. There’s really no harm in doing th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Andrew Wang
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Wang > wrote: > >> Thanks for the spot Sangjin. I think this bug introduced in >> create-release by HADOOP-14835. The multi-pass maven build generates these >> dummy client jars during the site build

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Andrew Wang
Thanks for the thorough review Vinod, some inline responses: *Issues found during testing* > > Major > - The previously supported way of being able to use different tar-balls > for different sub-modules is completely broken - common and HDFS tar.gz are > completely empty. > Is this something peo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Sangjin Lee
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: > Thanks for the spot Sangjin. I think this bug introduced in create-release > by HADOOP-14835. The multi-pass maven build generates these dummy client > jars during the site build since skipShade is specified. > > This might be enough to cancel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Andrew Wang
Thanks for the spot Sangjin. I think this bug introduced in create-release by HADOOP-14835. The multi-pass maven build generates these dummy client jars during the site build since skipShade is specified. This might be enough to cancel the RC. Thoughts? Best, Andrew On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:51

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Akira Ajisaka
> - When did we stop putting CHANGES files into the source artifacts? CHANGES files were removed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11792 > - Even after "mvn install"ing once, shading is repeated again and again for every new 'mvn install' even though there are no source change

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Sangjin Lee
I checked the client jars that are supposed to contain shaded dependencies, and they don't look quite right: $ tar -tzvf hadoop-3.0.0.tar.gz | grep hadoop-client-api-3.0.0.jar -rw-r--r-- 0 andrew andrew44531 Nov 14 11:53 hadoop-3.0.0/share/hadoop/client/hadoop-client-api-3.0.0.jar $ tar -tzvf

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Chen, Sammi
. -Original Message- From: John Zhuge [mailto:john.zh...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 6:56 AM To: Andrew Wang Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Sangjin Lee
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: > Thanks for all the push, Andrew! > > Looking at the RC. Went through my usual check-list. Here's my summary. > Will cast my final vote after comparing and validating my findings with > others. > > Verification > > - [Check] Succes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Thanks for all the push, Andrew! Looking at the RC. Went through my usual check-list. Here's my summary. Will cast my final vote after comparing and validating my findings with others. Verification - [Check] Successful recompilation from source tar-ball - [Check] Signature verification - [Ch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Daniel Templeton
+1 (binding) Built with JDK 1.8 and setup a single node cluster.  Messed around with resource types and found everything to be working as expected. Daniel On 11/14/17 1:34 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: Hi folks, Thanks as always to the many, many contributors who helped with this release. I've cre

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Compilation passed for me. Using jdk1.8.0_40.jdk. +Vinod > On Nov 20, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > > @vinod > I followed your command but I could not reproduce your problem. > > [weichiu@storage-1 hadoop-3.0.0-src]$ ls -al hadoop-common-project/hadoop-c > ommon/target/hadoop-comm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Wei-Chiu Chuang
@vinod I followed your command but I could not reproduce your problem. [weichiu@storage-1 hadoop-3.0.0-src]$ ls -al hadoop-common-project/hadoop-c ommon/target/hadoop-common-3.0.0.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 weichiu weichiu 37052439 Nov 20 21:59 hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/target/hadoop-common-3.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Xiao Chen
+1 (binding) Thanks Andrew! - Verified md5 and built from source - Started a pseudo distributed cluster with KMS, - Performed basic hdfs operations plus encryption related operations - Verified logs and webui - Confidence from CDH testings (will let Andrew answer officially, but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Shane Kumpf
Thanks, Andrew! +1 (non-binding) - Verified checksums and signatures - Deployed a single node cluster on CentOS 7.4 using the binary and source release - Ran hdfs commands - Ran pi and distributed shell using the default and docker runtimes - Verified the UIs - Verified the change log -Shane O

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Lei Xu
+1 binding Run the following steps: * Check md5 of sources and package. * Run a YARN + HDFS pseudo cluster. * Run terasuite on YARN. * Run HDFS CLIs (ls , rm , etc) On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: > Quick question. > > I used to be able (in 2.x line) to create

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Quick question. I used to be able (in 2.x line) to create dist tarballs (mvn clean install -Pdist -Dtar -DskipTests -Dmaven.javadoc.skip=true) from the source being voted on (hadoop-3.0.0-src.tar.gz). The idea is to install HDFS, YARN, MR separately in separate root-directories from the genera

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Arpit Agarwal
Thanks for that proposal Andrew, and for not wrapping up the vote yesterday. > In terms of downstream testing, we've done extensive > integration testing with downstreams via the alphas > and betas, and we have continuous integration running > at Cloudera against branch-3.0. Could you please shar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
I'd definitely extend it for a few more days. I only see 3 binding +1s so far - not a great number to brag about on our first major release in years. Also going to nudge folks into voting. +Vinod > On Nov 17, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: > > Hi Arpit, > > I agree the timing is not gr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-20 Thread Rakesh Radhakrishnan
Thanks Andrew for getting this out ! +1 (non-binding) * Built from source on CentOS 7.3.1611, jdk1.8.0_111 * Deployed non-ha cluster and tested few EC file operations. * Ran basic shell commands(ls, mkdir, put, get, ec, dfsadmin). * Ran some sample jobs. * HDFS Namenode UI looks good. Thanks, Ra

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-18 Thread Brahma Reddy Battula
+1 (non-binding). -Built from the source -Installed the HA Cluster -Ran basic shell commands -Ran sample jobs like pi,Slive Thanks Andrew for driving this. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Andrew Wang wrote: > Hi folks, > > Thanks as always to the many, many contributors who helped with this >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-18 Thread Mukul Kumar Singh
Thanks Andrew for setting up this release. +1 (non-binding) I built from source on Mac OS X 10.13.1 Java 1.8.0_111 - Deployed on a single node cluster. - Deployed a ViewFS cluster with two hdfs mount points. - Performed basic sanity checks. - Performed DFS operations(put, ls, mkdir, touch) Than

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-17 Thread Andrew Wang
Hi Arpit, I agree the timing is not great here, but extending it to meaningfully avoid the holidays would mean extending it an extra week (e.g. to the 29th). We've been coordinating with ASF PR for that Tuesday, so I'd really, really like to get the RC out before then. In terms of downstream test

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-17 Thread Arpit Agarwal
Hi Andrew, Thank you for your hard work in getting us to this step. This is our first major GA release in many years. I feel a 5-day vote window ending over the weekend before thanksgiving may not provide sufficient time to evaluate this RC especially for downstream components. Would you plea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-17 Thread Andrew Wang
Thanks for the spot, normally create-release spits those out. I uploaded asc and mds for the release artifacts. Best, Andrew On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Akira Ajisaka wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Signatures are missing. Would you upload them? > > Thanks, > Akira > > > On 2017/11/15 6:34, Andre

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-16 Thread Akira Ajisaka
Hi Andrew, Signatures are missing. Would you upload them? Thanks, Akira On 2017/11/15 6:34, Andrew Wang wrote: Hi folks, Thanks as always to the many, many contributors who helped with this release. I've created RC0 for Apache Hadoop 3.0.0. The artifacts are available here: http://people.apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

2017-11-16 Thread John Zhuge
+1 (binding) - Verified checksums of all tarballs - Built source with native, Java 1.8.0_131-b11 on Mac OS X 10.12.6 - Passed all S3A and ADL integration tests - Deployed both binary and built source to a pseudo cluster, passed the following sanity tests in insecure, SSL, and SSL+Ke