That's my intention.
-Sandy
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Chris Riccomini
wrote:
> Hey Sandy,
>
> Fantastic. Is this planned for 2.1.0?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On 6/12/13 10:59 AM, "Sandy Ryza" wrote:
>
> >Hi Chris,
> >
> >This is currently in the works:
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
Hey Sandy,
Fantastic. Is this planned for 2.1.0?
Cheers,
Chris
On 6/12/13 10:59 AM, "Sandy Ryza" wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>This is currently in the works:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-600.
>
>-Sandy
>
>
>On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Chris Riccomini
>wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I
Hi Chris,
This is currently in the works:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-600.
-Sandy
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Chris Riccomini
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I was able to get YARN up and running using CGroups yesterday, but I'm not
> seeing YARN write to cpu.shares. As a result, t
Hey guys,
I was able to get YARN up and running using CGroups yesterday, but I'm not
seeing YARN write to cpu.shares. As a result, the CPU-level isolation is just
limited to equal-sharing between all NM processes. That is, if one proc asks
for 10 virtual cores, and the other asks for 2, on a 12
