[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4761) NMs reconnecting with changed capabilities can lead to wrong cluster resource calculations on fair scheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182647#comment-15182647 ] zhihai xu commented on YARN-4761: - I just committed it to trunk, branch-2, branch-2.8, bran

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-3216) Max-AM-Resource-Percentage should respect node labels

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182630#comment-15182630 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-3216: --- Yes. YARN-4751 is handling that as per current available way

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4719) Add a helper library to maintain node state and allows common queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182591#comment-15182591 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4719: -- Hi [~kasha], bq. through addNode and removeNode so tot

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-3216) Max-AM-Resource-Percentage should respect node labels

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182579#comment-15182579 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-3216: - [~sunilg], Well before putting the effor

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-3216) Max-AM-Resource-Percentage should respect node labels

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182575#comment-15182575 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-3216: --- Agreeing to your point. And extremely sorry for missing out.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-3998) Add retry-times to let NM re-launch container when it fails to run

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182570#comment-15182570 ] Varun Vasudev edited comment on YARN-3998 at 3/7/16 4:36 AM: - M

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-3998) Add retry-times to let NM re-launch container when it fails to run

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182570#comment-15182570 ] Varun Vasudev commented on YARN-3998: - My apologies for not responding earlier. I think

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4752) [Umbrella] FairScheduler: Improve preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182566#comment-15182566 ] Xianyin Xin commented on YARN-4752: --- hi [~kasha], can we consider to decouple the schedul

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4134) FairScheduler preemption stops at queue level that all child queues are not over their fairshare

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182564#comment-15182564 ] Xianyin Xin commented on YARN-4134: --- [~kasha], fine. :) > FairScheduler preemption stops

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-3216) Max-AM-Resource-Percentage should respect node labels

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182548#comment-15182548 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-3216: - Hi [~wangda] & [~sunilg], Given that YA

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4761) NMs reconnecting with changed capabilities can lead to wrong cluster resource calculations on fair scheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182542#comment-15182542 ] Hudson commented on YARN-4761: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9429 (See [https:

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4761) NMs reconnecting with changed capabilities can lead to wrong cluster resource calculations on fair scheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182514#comment-15182514 ] zhihai xu commented on YARN-4761: - +1 for the latest patch, the test failures are not elate

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4763) RMApps Page crashes with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182469#comment-15182469 ] Rohith Sharma K S commented on YARN-4763: - As I see this issue is not because of rm

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4752) [Umbrella] FairScheduler: Improve preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182438#comment-15182438 ] Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-4752: Update: Started looking at each of the sub

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4763) RMApps Page crashes with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182437#comment-15182437 ] sandflee commented on YARN-4763: I think a general way fix for this is we should get rmappa

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4712) CPU Usage Metric is not captured properly in YARN-2928

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182347#comment-15182347 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4712: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Updated] (YARN-4712) CPU Usage Metric is not captured properly in YARN-2928

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Naganarasimha G R updated YARN-4712: Attachment: YARN-4712-YARN-2928.v1.004.patch thanks for the comments [~sjlee0]. Reverting the

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4700) ATS storage has one extra record each time the RM got restarted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182247#comment-15182247 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-4700: - Thanks for the review and the commit [~v

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4764) Application submission fails when submitted queue is not available in scheduler xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182066#comment-15182066 ] Bibin A Chundatt commented on YARN-4764: [~jianhe] In current approach we are reje