[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13731249#comment-13731249
]
Alejandro Abdelnur commented on YARN-1004:
--
bq. Isn't it simpler for FS to ignore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13727893#comment-13727893
]
Arun C Murthy commented on YARN-1004:
-
Isn't it simpler for FS to ignore the existing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13727921#comment-13727921
]
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-1004:
---
bq. Isn't it simpler for FS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13728165#comment-13728165
]
Arun C Murthy commented on YARN-1004:
-
Looks like this will force a break MR users via
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13728330#comment-13728330
]
Alejandro Abdelnur commented on YARN-1004:
--
[~acmurthy], I think we should address
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13726122#comment-13726122
]
Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-1004:
--
Uploaded a patch that adds fair, capacity, and fifo to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13726124#comment-13726124
]
Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-1004:
--
By which I mean [~tucu00]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13726199#comment-13726199
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1004:
-
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13727128#comment-13727128
]
Alejandro Abdelnur commented on YARN-1004:
--
Agree we should keep MAX as the only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13725299#comment-13725299
]
Hitesh Shah commented on YARN-1004:
---
Is there a reason why maximum-allocation is also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13725395#comment-13725395
]
Bikas Saha commented on YARN-1004:
--
It would be sad to have deprecated configs when YARN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13725476#comment-13725476
]
Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-1004:
--
[~hitesh], maximum-allocation is just for consistency.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13725517#comment-13725517
]
Hitesh Shah commented on YARN-1004:
---
[~sandyr] Scheduler-specific configs are fine as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13725522#comment-13725522
]
Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-1004:
--
[~hitesh], your reasoning makes sense to me. I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13725530#comment-13725530
]
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-1004:
---
bq. maximum-allocation is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13725556#comment-13725556
]
Hitesh Shah commented on YARN-1004:
---
[~vinodkv] min allocation is no longer visible to an
16 matches
Mail list logo