[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-27 Thread Hitesh Shah (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15261187#comment-15261187 ] Hitesh Shah commented on YARN-4844: --- bq. Per my understanding, changing from int to long won't affect

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-25 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15257158#comment-15257158 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4844: -- bq. ...Given the debate about the extent of the changes we want to

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-25 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15257142#comment-15257142 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4844: -- bq. So the plan is to force users to change their usage of these APIs

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-25 Thread Varun Vasudev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15256606#comment-15256606 ] Varun Vasudev commented on YARN-4844: - I'm a little concerned with the size of the changes required,

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-22 Thread Hitesh Shah (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15254970#comment-15254970 ] Hitesh Shah commented on YARN-4844: --- Additionally we are not talking about use in production but rather

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-22 Thread Hitesh Shah (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15254967#comment-15254967 ] Hitesh Shah commented on YARN-4844: --- bq. considering there are hundreds of blockers and criticals of

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-22 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15254944#comment-15254944 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4844: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-22 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15254897#comment-15254897 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4844: -- [~hitesh], considering there are hundreds of blockers and criticals of

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-22 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15253472#comment-15253472 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4844: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-21 Thread Hitesh Shah (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15253084#comment-15253084 ] Hitesh Shah commented on YARN-4844: --- bq. It is not a very hard thing to drop it, we'd better to do it

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-21 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15253048#comment-15253048 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4844: -- [~hitesh], Agree it is very messy but it seems there's no other way

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-21 Thread Hitesh Shah (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15253028#comment-15253028 ] Hitesh Shah commented on YARN-4844: --- getMemoryLong(), etc just seems messy. I can understand why this is

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-21 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15253005#comment-15253005 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4844: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-21 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15253004#comment-15253004 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4844: -- An additional note about why it is a 2.8 blocker: Currently Capacity

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4844) Upgrade fields of o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource from int32 to int64

2016-04-21 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15252976#comment-15252976 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4844: -- Discussed with [~vinodkv], [~jianhe], [~hitesh] about this issue. A