[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14099255#comment-14099255 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - Thanks for you comment, Jian. I agree with you. I

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14099224#comment-14099224 ] Jian He commented on YARN-659: -- [~ozawa], thanks for your effort on this ! bq. One design conce

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094958#comment-14094958 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - [~jianhe] [~kkambatl] could you take a look, plea

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094882#comment-14094882 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - The test failure is not related to this patch, an

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094228#comment-14094228 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-659: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of test

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13939957#comment-13939957 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-659: {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of te

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13856605#comment-13856605 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-659: {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of te

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13855007#comment-13855007 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-659: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of test

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13854837#comment-13854837 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-659: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of test

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13823311#comment-13823311 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - About this JIRA, we can make the assumption that

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822134#comment-13822134 ] Bikas Saha commented on YARN-659: - Sorry for now being clear. I was clarifying on "no direct

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822127#comment-13822127 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - [~bikassaha], correct me if I'm wrong. IIUC, ZooK

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822120#comment-13822120 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - Ah, I misunderstood. Thank you for pointing out,

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822113#comment-13822113 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - > If version is -1 in the delete command then the

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822107#comment-13822107 ] Bikas Saha commented on YARN-659: - Please look at the API http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822092#comment-13822092 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - Hi [~jianhe], ZK doesn't support 'directory remov

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13821901#comment-13821901 ] Jian He commented on YARN-659: -- Hi [~ozawa], I noticed that while we are removing app state fro

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13807920#comment-13807920 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - This JIRA can be done after 1307. > RMStateStore

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13797347#comment-13797347 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - Oh, I posted to wrong JIRA. Repost this to correc

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13797341#comment-13797341 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - This is the summary of current znode structure(Be

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13794660#comment-13794660 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - Yes, your idea is better if we rethink the overal

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13794658#comment-13794658 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - Created YARN-1307 for discussing znode structure.

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13794653#comment-13794653 ] Bikas Saha commented on YARN-659: - We should create attempt znodes as a subtree of the app z

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13794624#comment-13794624 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - OK, I agree with you. Let's create a separate JIR

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13794620#comment-13794620 ] Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-659: --- If we are changing the znode structure, I pro

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13794028#comment-13794028 ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on YARN-659: - [~maysamyabandeh], in the FileSystemRMStateStore

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13684136#comment-13684136 ] Maysam Yabandeh commented on YARN-659: -- But, it seems that FileSystemRMStateStore uses