dropped patch now included in update
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
...SNR_xxx-instead-of-__NR_xxx-for-sysc.patch | 45 ---
...ibseccomp_2.4.2.bb => libseccomp_2.4.3.bb} | 3 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 47 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
On 3/7/20 2:18 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 08:38:49PM +, akuster wrote:
>> dropped patch now included in update
> Do you want to remove the patch?
yeah.. I should.
v2 shortly
thanks,
Armin
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
>> ---
>>
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is the next 5.2.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, as the 13th v5.2.x post-EOL release.
The content is from an audit of what went into the v5.4.8 release which
started out around 200 commits. I front loaded in about a 1/2 dozen
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 08:38:49PM +, akuster wrote:
> dropped patch now included in update
Do you want to remove the patch?
> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
> ---
> .../libseccomp/{libseccomp_2.4.2.bb => libseccomp_2.4.3.bb}| 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.4.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.4.bb
b/recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.4.bb
index d42a455..c5ddd5c 100644
--- a/recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.4.bb
+++
dropped patch now included in update
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
.../libseccomp/{libseccomp_2.4.2.bb => libseccomp_2.4.3.bb}| 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename recipes-security/libseccomp/{libseccomp_2.4.2.bb =>
libseccomp_2.4.3.bb} (90%)
diff --git
On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 16:58 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 22:53 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 23:42, Richard Purdie <
> > richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > Just FYI I think there may also be a couple of other packages
> > >
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 22:53 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 23:42, Richard Purdie <
> richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Just FYI I think there may also be a couple of other packages
> > coreutils
> > pulls in and they may also have reproducibility issues
