Re: [yocto] how crippled is ruby support in YP 3.0?

2020-06-26 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 23:18, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > If we actually had some tests for it, we might have a much better idea. > > The areas of the project with good automated tests tend not to regress > without our noticing. Areas with no tests can and do :( >

Re: [yocto] how crippled is ruby support in YP 3.0?

2020-06-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 14:19 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > background: trying to get ruby and a number of ruby gems migrated > from "morty" to "zeus", and nothing but grief trying to > compile/install ruby gems. > > plan A: start with standard YP layers all checked out to "zeus", > and > add

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder-helper][PATCH]scripts/utils.py: Convert md5sum to sha256sum for layer tarballs

2020-06-26 Thread Vineela
Signed-off-by: Vineela Tummalapalli --- scripts/utils.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/utils.py b/scripts/utils.py index d7b9ae7..ec43832 100644 --- a/scripts/utils.py +++ b/scripts/utils.py @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ def publishrepo(clonedir, repo, publishd

[yocto] how crippled is ruby support in YP 3.0?

2020-06-26 Thread Robert P. J. Day
background: trying to get ruby and a number of ruby gems migrated from "morty" to "zeus", and nothing but grief trying to compile/install ruby gems. plan A: start with standard YP layers all checked out to "zeus", and add vendor layer -- still similar grief. current plan: start from absolu

Re: [yocto] llvm native

2020-06-26 Thread Damien LEFEVRE
Hi, I added meta-clang layer and it solved my problem. Cheers, -Damien On Fri, Jun 26, 2020, 11:20 Yann Dirson wrote: > Oh, and beware of master and dunfell with llvm-config, if your target is > multilib. > You may need the patch referenced in > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?i

Re: [yocto] #yocto Using BBMASK or BBFILES with multiconfig

2020-06-26 Thread Joshua Watt
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:55 AM wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm working on a project using multiconfig, with Yocto version 2.6. I'd like > to enable or disable an entire layer, depending on which multiconfig is > selected. My initial thought is to use BBMASK, and mask out undesired layers > in a mul

[yocto] #yocto Using BBMASK or BBFILES with multiconfig

2020-06-26 Thread schadley
Hi all, I'm working on a project using multiconfig, with Yocto version 2.6. I'd like to enable or disable an entire layer, depending on which multiconfig is selected. My initial thought is to use BBMASK, and mask out undesired layers in a multiconfig conf file, but I'm having trouble getting th

[yocto] #yocto #python

2020-06-26 Thread valentin . duee
Hi, if I try to add a layer like this: bitbake-layers add-layer ../layers/meta-openembedded/meta-oe (also for other layers) I get following error: The following required tools (as specified by HOSTTOOLS) appear to be unavailable in PATH, please install them in order to proceed: python But I do

Re: [yocto] llvm native

2020-06-26 Thread Yann Dirson
Oh, and beware of master and dunfell with llvm-config, if your target is multilib. You may need the patch referenced in https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13937 Le ven. 26 juin 2020 à 10:17, Yann Dirson a écrit : > Did you check that llvm-native is listed in the sysroot-providers

Re: [yocto] llvm native

2020-06-26 Thread Yann Dirson
Did you check that llvm-native is listed in the sysroot-providers folder, and that tmp/sysroots-components/x86_64/llvm-native/ contains the expected files ? Le jeu. 25 juin 2020 à 19:17, Randy MacLeod a écrit : > On 2020-06-10 9:10 a.m., Damien LEFEVRE wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to build