Re: [yocto] spidev.c ?

Hello John, It seems that your target is configured correctly. Since you have all the components you should and must have as SPI framework. Namely I was looking for /sys/bus (since you must have an SPI bus driver), and then /sys/class (since as my best understanding is that SPI is a master/slave

[yocto] Avahi in yocto #yocto

Hello Guys i have installed *avahi-0.8* version using gatesgarth version, its compiled successfully but i am facing an *issue* with *TriggeredBy: [[0;1;32m●[[0m avahi-daemon.socket, when i restart my service. [[0;1;32m●[[0m avahi-daemon.service - Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD Stack Loaded: loaded (/lib/syst

[yocto] does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there something that still needs docbook support? i'm about to take a quick look to see what's demanding that, does anyone know? rday -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links:

[yocto] is there a recent explanation of tricks you can play with MACHINEOVERRIDES?

years ago, i asked about how to support a small set of closely-related targets using MACHINEOVERRIDES to define how to apply patches in a (somewhat) hierarchical fashion: https://www.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2016-March/028922.html is there any current BSP that does something like tha

Re: [yocto] does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:47 AM Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and > noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there > something that still needs docbook support? i'm about to take a quick > look to see what's dem

Re: [yocto] does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:47 AM Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > > > > > testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and > > noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there > > something that still needs docboo

Re: [yocto] does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards, Mike Looijmans System Expert TOPIC Embedded Products B.V. Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best The Netherlands T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69 E: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com W: www.topic.nl Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail On 19-03-2021

Re: [yocto] does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Mike Looijmans wrote: > > Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards, > > Mike Looijmans > System Expert > > > TOPIC Embedded Products B.V. > Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best > The Netherlands > > T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69 > E: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com > W: www.topic.nl > > Pleas

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] tpm2-tss-engine: update 1.1.0

LIC_FILES_CHKSUM hash changed between branches. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- .../{tpm2-tss-engine_1.0.1.bb => tpm2-tss-engine_1.1.0.bb} | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/tpm2-tss-engine/{tpm2-tss-engine_1.0.1.bb => tpm2-tss-engine_1.1.

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] swtpm: update to 0.5.2

Add python package Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- .../swtpm/{swtpm_0.2.0.bb => swtpm_0.5.2.bb}| 17 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) rename meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/swtpm/{swtpm_0.2.0.bb => swtpm_0.5.2.bb} (78%) diff --git a/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/swtpm/swtpm_0.