Re: [yocto] Is it a bug or it does not support device tree /delete-node/?

Hi, On June 5, 2021 12:43:19 AM UTC, JH wrote: >Hi, > >I am building following imx6ulz-kobs.dts file to a dtb in zeus: > >$ cat imx6ulz-kobs.dts > >#include "imx6ulz.dts" > >/{ > model = "customized imx6ull"; > compatible = "fsl,imx6ull"; >}; > >&gpmi { >/delete-node/ fsl,use-minimum-ecc; >

Re: [yocto] bitbake controlling memory use

Op 14-04-2021 om 06:59 schreef Richard Purdie: On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 21:14 -0400, Randy MacLeod wrote: On 2021-04-11 12:19 p.m., Alexander Kanavin wrote: make already has -l option for limiting new instances if load average is too high, so it's only natural to add a RAM limiter too.    -l [N]

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 0/7] YCL cleanups

This series superceeds the privious set to help pass the check-layer scrip. Armin Kuster (7): meta-security: add sanity check meta-security/recipe-kernel: use sanity check linux-yocto-dev: drop bbappend meta-tpm: add layer sanity check meta-tpm/linux-yocto: use sanity support meta-inte

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 1/7] meta-security: add sanity check

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- README | 18 ++ classes/sanity-meta-security.bbclass | 10 ++ conf/layer.conf | 4 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+) create mode 100644 classes/sanity-meta-security.bbclass diff --gi

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/7] meta-security/recipe-kernel: use sanity check

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-dev.bbappend | 4 +--- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.%.bbappend | 4 +--- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_security.inc | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yo

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 4/7] meta-tpm: add layer sanity check

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta-tpm/README | 19 +++ meta-tpm/classes/sanity-meta-tpm.bbclass | 10 ++ meta-tpm/conf/layer.conf | 4 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta-tpm/classes/sanity-meta-tpm.b

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 3/7] linux-yocto-dev: drop bbappend

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-dev.bbappend | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) delete mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-dev.bbappend diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-dev.bbappend b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-dev.bbappend deleted

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 7/7] meta-integrity/recipe-kernel: use sanity check

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta-integrity/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-%.bbappend | 6 +- meta-integrity/recipes-kernel/linux/linux_ima.inc| 5 + 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta-integrity/recipes-kernel/linux/linux_ima.inc diff --git a/met

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 5/7] meta-tpm/linux-yocto: use sanity support

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- .../linux/linux-yocto_5.%.bbappend | 18 +- .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_tpm.inc | 17 + 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta-tpm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_tpm.inc

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 6/7] meta-integrity: add sanity check

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta-integrity/README.md | 18 +- .../classes/sanity-meta-integrity.bbclass | 10 ++ meta-integrity/conf/layer.conf | 4 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 me

Re: [yocto] Is it a bug or it does not support device tree /delete-node/?

Thanks Quentin, that did the trick. On 6/5/21, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi, > > On June 5, 2021 12:43:19 AM UTC, JH wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I am building following imx6ulz-kobs.dts file to a dtb in zeus: >> >>$ cat imx6ulz-kobs.dts >> >>#include "imx6ulz.dts" >> >>/{ >> model = "customized imx6ull";