Re: [yocto] multilib SDK

I see, are you talking about ${MLPREFIX} variable? The target itself compiles fine, all are 32-bit binaries in userspace. I have this issue only for SDK. On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 7:21 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > On 9/14/21 6:13 PM, Arun wrote: > > The packages that SDK is trying to build are

Re: [yocto] multilib SDK

On 9/14/21 6:13 PM, Arun wrote: The packages that SDK is trying to build are userspace packages and they haven't been ported for 64-bit. There are quite a few of them and short of fixing 64-bit compile issues for all of them, I am trying to see if I can build SDK without these packages built

Re: [yocto] multilib SDK

The packages that SDK is trying to build are userspace packages and they haven't been ported for 64-bit. There are quite a few of them and short of fixing 64-bit compile issues for all of them, I am trying to see if I can build SDK without these packages built for. 64-bit. The SDK users will

Re: [yocto] multilib SDK

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 3:41 PM Arun wrote: > > Bumping this question... > > Is there a way for me to disable building of 64-bit packages when building > SDK with a multilib config? I have no use for 64-bit userspace package > artifacts. I think since kernel is 64bit it might be building some

Re: [yocto] multilib SDK

Bumping this question... Is there a way for me to disable building of 64-bit packages when building SDK with a multilib config? I have no use for 64-bit userspace package artifacts. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#54720):

[yocto] Using Poetry For Python Package #python

I have a python package hosted in an internal git repo that is currently configured to use Poetry and as such does not have a setup.py file. Yocto appears to expect a setup.py file (via inherit distutils3). It seems my two options are to either remove Poetry and convert from pyproject.toml to

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 6/6] isic: set precise BSD license

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-2-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-security/isic/isic_0.07.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes-security/isic/isic_0.07.bb b/recipes-security/isic/isic_0.07.bb index fb6e904..28153e3 100644

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 5/6] checksec: set precise BSD license

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-3-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-scanners/checksec/checksec_2.4.0.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes-scanners/checksec/checksec_2.4.0.bb b/recipes-scanners/checksec/checksec_2.4.0.bb

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 4/6] opendnssec: set precise BSD license

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-2-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-security/opendnssec/opendnssec_2.1.9.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes-security/opendnssec/opendnssec_2.1.9.bb

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 3/6] ibmswtpm2: set precise BSD license

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-2-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmswtpm2/ibmswtpm2_1661.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmswtpm2/ibmswtpm2_1661.bb

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/6] ibmtpm2tss: set precise BSD license

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-2-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmtpm2tss/ibmtpm2tss_1.6.0.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmtpm2tss/ibmtpm2tss_1.6.0.bb

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 1/6] trousers: set precise BSD license

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-3-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/trousers/trousers_git.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/trousers/trousers_git.bb

[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW37`21

Current Dev Position: YP 3.4 M4 Next Deadline: 4th Oct. 2021 YP 3.4 M4 build Next Team Meetings: * Bug Triage meeting Thursday Sept. 16th at 7:30am PDT ( https://zoom.us/j/454367603?pwd=ZGxoa2ZXL3FkM3Y0bFd5aVpHVVZ6dz09)

Re: [linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel-cache][yocto-5.10][PATCH] NFS: port to ker v5.10

Ok, so if the unfs feature is already dropped in mainline, we can drop it here. So it's up to you, if you want to have it in cache repo or not. Andrej On Tue, 2021-09-14 at 08:00 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 2:59 AM Valek, Andrej > wrote: > > > > Hello Bruce, > > > >

Re: [linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel-cache][yocto-5.10][PATCH] NFS: port to ker v5.10

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 2:59 AM Valek, Andrej wrote: > > Hello Bruce, > > Yes, I've tested it with 5.10.9 and 5.10.35, but I guess, it will work > for others as well. > > Current version in yocto-cache (5.10) it's broken, because the patching > will fail. So how it's being used then? It isn't.

Re: [yocto] Upgrading Nodejs from 10.x to 14.x in yocto Zeus #zeus #yocto #zeus

Hi On 9/14/21 6:55 AM, poorn...@elmeasure.com wrote: > Greetings ! > > I am using yocto zeus for my project . I am having a requirement of > Nodejs 14.x but the available Nodejs version in yocto zeus is 10.x . > Can anyone help me by sharing the steps to upgrade Nodejs 10.x to 14.x > in yocto

Re: [linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel-cache][yocto-5.10][PATCH] NFS: port to ker v5.10

Hello Bruce, Yes, I've tested it with 5.10.9 and 5.10.35, but I guess, it will work for others as well. Current version in yocto-cache (5.10) it's broken, because the patching will fail. So how it's being used then? What do you mean by sending the patch against "v5.10/standard/base" ? You can