[yocto] Build with stale kernel modules compared to kernel

I have an imx8mm based system built with Yocto dunfell and linux-fslc-imx 5.4.119 from meta-freescale. Recently, I had a Yocto build that didn't run properly. It turns out the kernel modules directory /lib/modules/5.4.119+gccebf7b87951 didn't match the version number of the kernel image (uname -

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 3/3] oeqa/cases/tpm2: fix and enhance test suite

local.conf TEST_SUITES = "ssh ping tpm2" IMAGE_INSTALL:append = " swtpm tpm2-pkcs11" RESULTS: RESULTS - ping.PingTest.test_ping: PASSED (0.05s) RESULTS - ssh.SSHTest.test_ssh: PASSED (2.19s) RESULTS - tpm2.Tpm2Test.test_tpm2_pcrread: PASSED (1.06s) RESULTS - tpm2.Tpm2Test.test_tpm2_pkcs11: PASSED

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/3] tpm2-tools: Add missing rdepends

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/tpm2-tools/tpm2-tools_5.2.bb | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/tpm2-tools/tpm2-tools_5.2.bb b/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/tpm2-tools/tpm2-tools_5.2.bb index f924038..c20af7e 100644 --- a/meta-tpm/recipes-t

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 1/3] tpm2-pkcs11: tpm2-pkcs11 module missing

Correctly fix symlink issue by putting module in -dev pkg. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/tpm2-pkcs11/tpm2-pkcs11_1.8.0.bb | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/tpm2-pkcs11/tpm2-pkcs11_1.8.0.bb b/meta-tpm/recipe

Re: [yocto] what's the situation with yocto support for qualcomm qcs{410,610} eval boards?

hey, On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 9:31 PM Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >colleague just asked if i had any useful advice (spoiler: no) on how > easy it would be to build a yocto-based image for *some* qcs410-based > eval board. i'm familiar with meta-qcom, and machine definitions for > dragonboards,

[yocto] what's the situation with yocto support for qualcomm qcs{410,610} eval boards?

colleague just asked if i had any useful advice (spoiler: no) on how easy it would be to build a yocto-based image for *some* qcs410-based eval board. i'm familiar with meta-qcom, and machine definitions for dragonboards, but this is clearly(?) different, and i see nothing in the meta-qcom laye

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] OpenEmbedded Developer meeting reminder

Hello Philip, when would the time slots be allocated? It doesn't look optimal to leave this to the last minute, as people need to plan their day. Alex On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 03:53, Philip Balister wrote: > > We are finalizing the agenda for the developer meeting this Friday (May > 20). The agen