Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] vc4-fkms-v3d vs. vc4-kms-v3d

2023-06-23 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 2:39 PM Manuel Wagesreither wrote: > > Hi users of meta-raspberrypi, > > I'd like to ask around if for you people vc4-kms-v3d (opposed to > vc4-fkms-v3d) *really* is the working way to get vc4 support on a Raspberry > Pi 4 Model B. > > Both on master and kirkstone,

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] vc4-fkms-v3d vs. vc4-kms-v3d

2023-06-23 Thread Manuel Wagesreither
Hi users of meta-raspberrypi, I'd like to ask around if for you people vc4-kms-v3d (opposed to vc4-fkms-v3d) *really* is the working way to get vc4 support on a Raspberry Pi 4 Model B. Both on master and kirkstone, vc4-kms-v3d is the default. It's defined in /conf/machine/raspberrypi4-64.conf:

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.0.11.rc1)

2023-06-23 Thread Steve Sakoman
There was an intermittent autobuilder issue that resurfaced on the oe-selftest-centos build: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/5388 Re-running oe-selftest-centos passed: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/5390 Steve On Fri, Jun

[yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.0.11.rc1)

2023-06-23 Thread Pokybuild User
A build flagged for QA (yocto-4.0.11.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at: https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-4.0.11.rc1 Build hash information: bitbake: 0c6f86b60cfba67c20733516957c0a654eb2b44c meta-agl: 1b0cad77090b75fc040f9de5db06374203fe34c5

Re: [yocto] Multiple wifi access points when using Connman

2023-06-23 Thread Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
Hi You can blacklist the other interface Michael On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 6:06 PM wrote: > > To whom it may concern, > > It appears some services are from the `wlan` interface while other are from > the `p2p` interface of the same physical Wi-Fi module. The addresses of the > devices are,

Re: [yocto] Multiple wifi access points when using Connman

2023-06-23 Thread logan . grosz
To whom it may concern, It appears some services are from the `wlan` interface while other are from the `p2p` interface of the same physical Wi-Fi module. The addresses of the devices are, `00:1f:7b:31:8f:32` and `02:1f:7b:b5:8f:32`, which result in the 00 vs 02 phenomenon I noticed. Thank