Re: [yocto] Add qtbase and qtwayland to core-image-minimal

Hi, On 7/22/24 8:40 AM, Poornesh G ( India - Bangalore ) via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from poornesh.g=mindteck@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important Greetings ! I have built a yocto for RK3568

Re: [yocto] Pokysdk-linux libc cannot find a version of GLIBC

Hi Hannes, On 7/14/24 6:06 PM, diersen-hannes via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from diersen-hannes=web...@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important Hello, I am using ZephyrSDK to develop some embedded

Re: [Yocto][QA] patches : QA Issue: Missing Upstream-Status in patch

Hi Yann, On 7/11/24 3:50 PM, Yann CARDAILLAC via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from ycnakajsph=gmail@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important Well, I'm not really sure I would need it in most cases. For

Re: [yocto] meta-rockchip: rk3568 GPU support

Hi Marek, On 6/27/24 2:07 PM, Belisko Marek wrote: Hi Quentin, On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 1:49 PM Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Marek, On 6/27/24 11:49 AM, Marek Belisko via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from marek.belisko= gmail@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why

Re: [yocto] meta-rockchip: rk3568 GPU support

Hi Marek, On 6/27/24 11:49 AM, Marek Belisko via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from marek.belisko=gmail@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important Hi, I'm just checking how to enable GPU acceleration for

Re: [yocto] query on building rabbitmq-c

Hi Simon, On 5/30/24 7:21 PM, SIMON BABY via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Hello Alexander, Thank you for helping this out. I can see packages-split with below files:

Re: [yocto] Raspberry CM4 does not load audremap overlay

Hi Federico, On 5/23/24 5:03 PM, Federico via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from farias=automac@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important Hello, I'm new to the Yocto and Raspberry community, so let me

Re: [docs] [yocto] Workaround for uid_map error on Ubuntu 24.04

Hi Michael, On 5/23/24 10:45 AM, Michael Opdenacker wrote: On 5/21/24 at 16:31, Etienne Cordonnier via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: The way I see to patch this at the moment is to print instructions for the users to run this command manually when this specific error happens (we can't run it

Re: [yocto] [Basic]: bitbake menuconfig not reflected changes from custom defconfig

Hi Ashish, On 5/22/24 6:31 PM, emailaddress.ashish via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from emailaddress.ashish=gmail@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important Hi All , I am trying basic kernel config change

Re: [yocto] Workaround for uid_map error on Ubuntu 24.04

Hi Étienne, On 5/19/24 10:34 PM, Etienne Cordonnier via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from ecordonnier=snap@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important Hi all, in order to build poky on Ubuntu 24.04, I have

Re: [yocto] Strange errors while executing poky/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_13.2.bb using scarthgap release

Hi Zoran, On 5/17/24 1:28 PM, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: Remember how Fedora 40 is unsupported? If you want to use Fedora 40 then you’ll need to join in with the effort to support GCC 14.1, which involves fixing problems like this. If you don’t want to do that, then use a supported host

Re: [yocto] Strange errors while executing poky/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_13.2.bb using scarthgap release

Hi Zoran, On 5/16/24 2:28 PM, Zoran via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: [You don't often get email from zoran.stojsavljevic=gmail@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hello all, I have a really strange error while compiling

Re: [yocto] Command line Variable

Hi Brati, On 5/7/24 7:17 AM, Bratiranjan Acharya via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Hello there! I've recently experimented with incorporating the following lines into my recipe file: BB_ENV_PASSTHROUGH_ADDITIONS = "BUILD_ID" BUILD_ID ?= "none" However, despite these additions, I encountered a

Re: [yocto] Wic Image Generation

Hi Brati, Please always use the "Answer all" button so that the mailing list is still in copy. On 4/22/24 11:47, Bratiranjan Acharya wrote: Hi, I've reviewed the information you shared. Can you clarify one thing for me? In the last line, "bootloader --ptable gpt," what does it entail?

Re: [yocto] Wic Image Generation

Hi Brati, On 4/16/24 10:36, Bratiranjan Acharya via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from bratiranjan12=gmail@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important -- Forwarded message - From: Bratiranjan

Re: [yocto] Implicit RPROVIDES somewhere ?

Hi Joel, On 4/18/24 10:50, Joel GUITTET via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: Hello Quentin, Yes not uncommon setup except my prebuilt libraries don't match the initial expectations: 1. The filename must have the version appended, for example: libbar.so.1.2.3. (can be easily renamed by the way)

Re: [yocto] Implicit RPROVIDES somewhere ?

Hi Joel, On 4/16/24 19:09, Joel GUITTET via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: You don't often get email from jguittet.opensource=witekio@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important Hello Quentin, Thanks for the quick reply on this

Re: [yocto] Implicit RPROVIDES somewhere ?

Hi Joel, On 4/16/24 16:50, Joel GUITTET via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from jguittet.opensource=witekio@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important Hello, I have a target with multilib aarch64+arm. I'm

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] enable stored U-Boot environment

Hi Trevor, On 3/21/24 18:53, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: When U-Boot is built it is compiled with a set of environment variables (and their values) built into the U-Boot binary. U-Boot can be configured to use storage to load and/or store environment variables which can

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 3/4] remove /boot partition from wic:bootimg-paritition

Hi Trevor, On 2/21/24 20:18, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Wed 2024-02-21 @ 07:31:17 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, On 2/18/24 18:28, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Fri 2024-02-16 @ 10:31:36 AM, Quentin Schulz wrote: On 2/16/24 09:25, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Thu 2024-02-15 @ 06:45:59 PM,

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 3/5] rockchip.wks: add most Rockchip partitions

Hi Trevor, On 2/21/24 20:02, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Wed 2024-02-21 @ 07:38:41 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, On 2/19/24 18:48, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Rockchip defines the expected layout/map of the default storage device. Fill out the wks description so it

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 4/5] remove /boot partition

Hi Trevor, On 2/19/24 18:48, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: In order to boot successfully, most Rockchip SoCs require a specific partitioning scheme which was defined many years (and many SoCs) ago. That partitioning scheme places the SPL and U-Boot at specific offsets at the

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 3/5] rockchip.wks: add most Rockchip partitions

Hi Trevor, On 2/19/24 18:48, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Rockchip defines the expected layout/map of the default storage device. Fill out the wks description so it matches. https://opensource.rock-chips.com/wiki_Partitions There are 2 partitions at the start that

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 1/5] rockchip.wks: specify offsets in sectors

Hi Trevor, On 2/19/24 18:48, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: In WIC, size arguments can be optionally specified using one of a variety of suffixes (e.g. K, M, G, etc.) thanks to sizetype(). One such suffix being "s/S" for handling sector sizes which are assumed to be 512 bytes,

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 3/4] remove /boot partition from wic:bootimg-paritition

Hi Trevor, On 2/18/24 18:28, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Fri 2024-02-16 @ 10:31:36 AM, Quentin Schulz wrote: On 2/16/24 09:25, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Thu 2024-02-15 @ 06:45:59 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, On 2/12/24 21:23, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: [...]

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v2 3/4] remove /boot partition

Hi Trevor, On 2/16/24 09:29, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: In order to boot successfully, most Rockchip SoCs require a specific partitioning scheme which was defined many years (and many SoCs) ago. That partitioning scheme places the SPL and U-Boot at specific offsets at the

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v2 2/4] rockchip.wks: add all Rockchip partitions

Hi Trevor, On 2/16/24 09:29, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Rockchip defines the expected layout/map of the default storage device. Fill out the wks description so it matches. https://opensource.rock-chips.com/wiki_Partitions Note: in the Rockchip layout, not all

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 3/4] remove /boot partition from wic:bootimg-paritition

On 2/16/24 09:25, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Thu 2024-02-15 @ 06:45:59 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, On 2/12/24 21:23, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: [...] +UBOOT_EXTLINUX_KERNEL_IMAGE ?= "/boot/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}" FWIW, I don't think /boot is required.

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 2/4] rockchip.wks: add all Rockchip partitions

Hi Trevor, On 2/15/24 20:20, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Thu 2024-02-15 @ 06:06:42 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, On 2/12/24 21:23, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Rockchip defines the expected layout/map of the default storage device. Fill out the wks description so it

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 4/4] wks file cleanup

Hi Trevor, On 2/12/24 21:23, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Cleanup the elements of the wic/rockchip.wks file so they take up less horizontal space. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz Cheers, Quentin -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 3/4] remove /boot partition from wic:bootimg-paritition

Hi Trevor, On 2/12/24 21:23, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: In order to boot successfully, most Rockchip SoCs require a specific partitioning scheme which was defined many years (and many SoCs) ago. That partitioning scheme places the SPL and U-Boot at specific offsets at the

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 2/4] rockchip.wks: add all Rockchip partitions

Hi Trevor, On 2/12/24 21:23, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Rockchip defines the expected layout/map of the default storage device. Fill out the wks description so it matches. https://opensource.rock-chips.com/wiki_Partitions Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner ---

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 1/4] rockchip.wks: specify fstype

Hi Trevor, On 2/12/24 21:23, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: If the wks file doesn't specify, the fstype is assumed to be vfat. Most of the partitions in the Rockchip layout don't have filesystems. Implicitly setting the fstype to vfat causes wic to format the partitions. Also,

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] u-boot: make rock-pi-e patches only for rock-pi-e

Hi Trevor, On 1/24/24 18:51, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: The U-Boot patches that were added recently are only for the rock-pi-e MACHINE, therefore only apply them when building for rock-pi-e. Fixes: b5bba3a01197 ("rock-pi-e: apply upstream PHY fix") Signed-off-by: Trevor

Re: [yocto] Remove Python dependency from target package only

Hi Holger, On 1/22/24 14:33, Sebert, Holger.ext via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: [You don't often get email from holger.sebert.ext=karlstorz@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hi Richard, Von: Richard Purdie Try:

Re: [yocto] Problem when adding own tasks

Hi, On 11/11/23 18:05, Khem Raj via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 4:04 AM athragared via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Hello everyone, this is my first mail here, I hope this is the right "channel" for my question. I am currently using the 'Kirkstone' branch of

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 3/3] rock-pi-s: add

Hi Trevor, On 10/30/23 18:26, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Wed 2023-10-04 @ 04:23:31 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: On 10/3/23 15:56, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Mon 2023-10-02 @ 06:17:15 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: diff --git a/recipes-bsp/rkbin/rockchip-rkbin_git.bb

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] rockchip-rkbin: fail if lacking an override

Hi Trevor, Looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz Cheers, Quentin On 10/25/23 16:57, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Looking forward, rkbin should only be used by specific Rockchip platforms for which TF-A support is not (yet?) available. If rkbin gets added by

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH v3] rock-3a add

Hi Trevor, On 10/25/23 16:42, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Wed 2023-10-25 @ 04:22:17 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, On 10/25/23 15:56, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Hi Anthony, Thanks for working on this. On Mon 2023-10-16 @ 09:43:45 PM, anthony.t.dav...@gmail.com

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH v3] rock-3a add

Hi Trevor, On 10/25/23 15:56, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Hi Anthony, Thanks for working on this. On Mon 2023-10-16 @ 09:43:45 PM, anthony.t.dav...@gmail.com wrote: From: Anthony Davies Add support for the Radxa Rock 3A https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock3/3a The TF-A project

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH v2] rock-3a add

Hi Anthony, On 10/7/23 01:26, Anthony Davies via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: From: Anthony Davies Add support for the Radxa Rock 3A https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock3/3a The TF-A project does not currently have support for the rk3568. Therefore, for the time-being, the only way to supply a

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][kirkstone][PATCH] rk3588(s): add

Hi Trevor, On 10/5/23 11:00, Quentin Schulz wrote: From: Trevor Woerner Unfortunately the TF-A project does not currently have support for the rk3588. Therefore, for the time-being, the only way to supply a TPL/DDR-init for the rk3588 is to use the closed-source rkbin binaries from Rockchip.

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 3/3] rock-pi-s: add

Hi Trevor, On 10/3/23 15:56, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Mon 2023-10-02 @ 06:17:15 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, On 10/1/23 15:08, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: ROCK Pi S is a Rockchip RK3308 based SBC from Radxa. It contains a 64-bit quad core processor, USB,

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] KERNEL_DEVICETREE: 32-bit re-org

With Bruce in Cc for real this time :) On 10/4/23 15:45, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, On 10/3/23 15:38, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Tue 2023-10-03 @ 12:32:08 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, On 10/3/23 06:19, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: The upstream kernel

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] KERNEL_DEVICETREE: 32-bit re-org

Hi Trevor, On 10/3/23 15:38, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Tue 2023-10-03 @ 12:32:08 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, On 10/3/23 06:19, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: The upstream kernel reorganized the 32-bit arch/arm device-tree directory structure to separate out the

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH] Allow KERNEL_IMAGETYPE override v3

Hi Trevor, On 10/3/23 16:03, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Tue 2023-10-03 @ 12:17:13 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Anthony, On 10/3/23 02:43, Anthony Davies via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: [You don't often get email from anthony.t.davies=gmail@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] KERNEL_DEVICETREE: 32-bit re-org

Hi Trevor, On 10/3/23 06:19, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: The upstream kernel reorganized the 32-bit arch/arm device-tree directory structure to separate out the device-trees by manufacturer (similar to the organization of the arch/arm64 device-trees). Update the references

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH] machine include files use weak defaults

Hi Anthony, On 10/3/23 04:34, Anthony Davies via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: From: Anthony Davies This allows defaults to be set per machine.conf but also allows overrides in local.conf. NACK to the whole patch. ??= has a very different behavior than ?= and is weaker than ?=. c.f.

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH] Stop u-boot sections partition table

Hi Anthony, On 10/3/23 03:26, Anthony Davies via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: From: Anthony Davies When checking the partition table of builds using this layer you get numerous extra partitions due to each bootloader entry creating a partition. --no-table on these entries should stop this

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v2 0/4] u-boot cleanup

Hi Trevor, On 10/3/23 02:47, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: The U-Boot bbappend recipe was in need of some cleanups. v2: - breakup the original 1 patch into 4 to make the steps easier to audit/verify. Trevor Woerner (4): u-boot cleanup: move task u-boot cleanup:

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH] Allow KERNEL_IMAGETYPE override v3

Hi Anthony, On 10/3/23 02:43, Anthony Davies via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: [You don't often get email from anthony.t.davies=gmail@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] From: Anthony Davies Updated inc files to allow

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] virtual/tpl: add

Hi Trevor, On 10/3/23 02:08, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Be more obvious regarding the roles of TF-A vs rkbin: both provide a TPL for Rockchip SoCs, but only one should be used. No, they don't. U-Boot TPL is either a blob provided by Rockchip via the rockchip-rkbin

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 3/3] rock-pi-s: add

Hi Trevor, On 10/1/23 15:08, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: ROCK Pi S is a Rockchip RK3308 based SBC from Radxa. It contains a 64-bit quad core processor, USB, ethernet, wireless connectivity, and voice detection engine in 1.7-inches square. The ROCK Pi S comes in two RAM

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 2/3] rock-pi-e.conf: remove redundant MACHINEOVERRIDES

Hi Trevor, On 10/1/23 15:08, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: The MACHINE name is already added to the MACHINEOVERRIDES implicitly, no need to add it explicitly. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz Cheers, Quentin -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: cleanup

Hi Trevor, On 10/1/23 15:08, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Clean up the u-boot bbappend recipe: group items together and re-order as per the Yocto recipe style guide. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner --- recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot%.bbappend | 32 ++---

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] nanopi-r2s: add

Hi Trevor, On 10/2/23 16:11, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: The NanoPi R2S is a mini router with edge computing and dual GbE ports by FriendlyElec. It is based on the Rockchip RK3328 - a quad A53 core, 64-bit SoC running at 1.2GHz with at least 1GB of DDR4 RAM. It has one USB

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v4 2/2] rock-5b: add

Hi Trevor, On 9/27/23 04:42, Trevor Woerner wrote: [...] diff --git a/recipes-bsp/rkbin/rockchip-rkbin_git.bb b/recipes-bsp/rkbin/rockchip-rkbin_git.bb new file mode 100644 index ..7fefb017053b --- /dev/null +++ b/recipes-bsp/rkbin/rockchip-rkbin_git.bb @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH] Allow KERNEL_IMAGETYPE override v2

Hi Anthony, On 9/26/23 06:36, Anthony Davies via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: [You don't often get email from anthony.t.davies=gmail@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] From: Anthony Davies Apologies, this is the

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH] Allow KERNEL_IMAGETYPE override v2

On 9/26/23 11:13, Quentin Schulz via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Hi Anthony, On 9/26/23 10:25, Anthony Davies wrote: Hi Quentin Happy to contribute but not all that familiar with emailing patches, sorry. The Signed-off-by needs to be present in the commit log already

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH] Allow KERNEL_IMAGETYPE override v2

Hi Anthony, On 9/26/23 10:25, Anthony Davies wrote: Hi Quentin Happy to contribute but not all that familiar with emailing patches, sorry. The Signed-off-by needs to be present in the commit log already, it is not related to mailing list submission. It is added with git commit --signoff

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH] Allow KERNEL_IMAGETYPE override v2

Hi Anthony, Thanks for the patch! On 9/26/23 06:36, Anthony Davies via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: [You don't often get email from anthony.t.davies=gmail@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] From: Anthony Davies

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v3] rock-5b: add

Hi Trevor, On 9/25/23 18:26, Trevor Woerner wrote: Add support for the Radxa Rock 5B https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock5/5b The device-tree for this board is better in the 6.5 (and later) kernels, therefore set the kernel to linux-yocto-dev for now (eventually this won't be needed as linux-yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v2] rock5b: add

Hi Trevor, On 9/22/23 23:26, Trevor Woerner wrote: Add support for the Radxa Rock 5B https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock5/5b The device-tree for this board is better in the 6.5 (and later) kernels, therefore set the kernel to linux-yocto-dev for now (eventually this won't be needed as linux-yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] rock5b: add

Hi Trevor, On 9/22/23 17:06, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Fri 2023-09-22 @ 04:22:11 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Trevor, Looking good :) Thanks for looking into it, will be helpful to me in the upcoming weeks/months :) On 9/22/23 04:51, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Add

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] rock5b: add

Hi Trevor, Looking good :) Thanks for looking into it, will be helpful to me in the upcoming weeks/months :) On 9/22/23 04:51, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Add support for the Radxa Rock 5B https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock5/5b The device-tree for this board is better in the

Re: [yocto] Overriding package configuration as a distro

Hi Logan, On 9/18/23 16:43, Logan Grosz via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: You don't often get email from logan.grosz=b9c@lists.yoctoproject.org. Learn why this is important Hi, all I have two distros in the same meta layer, "A" and "B," and a

Re: [yocto] Question: Sharing SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR through Lustre/NFS for team work

Hi all, On 9/11/23 09:36, Alexander Kanavin via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 06:22, Chen Qi via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR are writable. Sharing them among different builds owned/controlled by the same user is OK, but sharing these writable

Re: [yocto] Rootless Podman

Hi, I, too, am using rootless podman on Fedora 38 (and 36 and 37 in the past). I use kas container for building: podman run -it --rm --userns=keep-id -e USER_ID=$UID -e GROUP_ID=$GID -v ~/work/yocto/sstate-cache:$HOME/work/yocto/sstate-cache -v

Re: [yocto] Need help with CMake cross compile using libxml2

Hi Stephen, On 4/11/23 02:00, Stephen Yu (Microchip) via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Hello Community, My CMake project needs to cross compile (.c sources) using libxml2. * The CMakeLists.txt has "find_package(LibXml2)" * The recipe.bb has * "DEPENDS += "libxml2" *

Re: [yocto] Compilation of z3gateway

Hi Hassan, I believe the issue is that the Makefile is not in your `S` directory. You can run `pwd` in do_install and check where the Makefile is relative to this path and update S to point to this or make sure SRC_URI installs your file in the directory pointed to by S. Cheers, Quentin

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Enabling libcamera-apps

Hi, On 3/15/23 10:14, punctuation via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Dear community, how do I i include libcamera-apps in my image? I have tried with: IMAGE_INSTALL += "libcamera-apps" But it doesn't find the libcamera-apps recipe. It seems it is only available in langdale and master

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] nanopi-r4s: add

Hi Trevor, On 2/22/23 21:09, Trevor Woerner wrote: Add a MACHINE definition for the FriendlyElec NanoPi R2S

Re: [yocto] ERROR: No recipes available for:

Hi Murali, On 2/17/23 06:59, Murali Krishna wrote: Time: 0:00:00Loaded 3775 entries from dependency cache.ERROR: No recipes available for: /home/murali/test/sources/meta-boundary/recipes-browser/chromium/chromium_%.bbappend

Re: [yocto] SSTATE_DIR by MACHINE target?

Hi Matt, On 1/20/23 14:23, mattwood2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Quentin, I work with many different hardware platforms and architectures. I keep my SSTATE cache on a NAS drive and I was hoping to set up a site.conf that would organize the full build SSTATE cache by architecture. It sounds like

Re: [yocto] SSTATE_DIR by MACHINE target?

Hi Matt, On 1/19/23 17:37, mattwood2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, is it possible to have SSTATE_DIR overrides based on the MACHINE target or SOC family? What are you trying to do? Which problem are you trying to solve that would require this? For example, is this valid: SSTATE_DIR:sama5 =

Re: [yocto] Remove kernel image and modules from rootfs

Hi Konstantin, On 1/3/23 16:58, Konstantin Kletschke wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 05:11:35PM +0100, Quentin Schulz wrote: but this is now deprecated for kirkstone and should be done this way: RRECOMMENDS:${KERNEL_PACKAGE_NAME}-base = "" This makes sense, I'll send a patch updating the

Re: [yocto] lsusb

Hi Ron, On 12/24/22 20:17, Mistyron wrote: On 2022-12-24 08:38, Markus Volk wrote: Am Sa, 24. Dez 2022 um 08:34:49 -0800 schrieb Mistyron : $ grep usb path/to/package.manifest   libusb-1.0-0   usbutils usbutils-python lsusb is part of usbutils, so it is not explicitly listed, but should be

Re: [yocto] bitbake controlling memory use

Hi Ferry, On 1/3/23 15:29, Ferry Toth wrote: Hi Alex, Op 03-01-2023 om 15:18 schreef Alexander Kanavin: I have to note that even the most expensive 16 Gb RAM module is less than 100 Euro, and can be obtained for half that much. Surely you value your time more than that? Of course. And if I

Re: [yocto] Remove kernel image and modules from rootfs

Hi Konstantin, On 12/21/22 22:13, Konstantin Kletschke wrote: Hi, I am creating a rootfs/bootloader/kernel to run on a beaglebone black usually and it works great. So I have in conf/local.conf MACHINE ?= "beaglebone-yocto" and an own layer meta-insidem2m which defines some image settings in

Re: Private: Re: [yocto] Get target machine

Hi Iggy, Please keep the mailing list in copy. On 12/2/22 02:58, j.ignatius via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Thanks Quentin for your reply. I found a number of product-config.in files under different target folders like xione-uk, xione-us, etc. These must be the machine configuration files.

Re: [yocto] Get target machine

Hi Iggy, On 12/1/22 13:55, Iggy via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: Hi, I have a .inc file that contains this information: # Set the MACHINE string, expected to eventually replace the long list of # build settings below EXTRA_OECMAKE += "-DRDK_MACHINE=${@d.getVar('MACHINE', False)} " # Set the

Re: [yocto] how to specify the package version via RDEPENDS in package group #bitbake

Hi Martin, On 11/23/22 06:25, Martin wrote: thanks for reply, i original method was specified the package version in local.conf by PREFEREED_VERSION. i wondering if configure package version in package group via RDEPENDS makes it possible? but it seems impossible. what situations allow

Re: [yocto] #kirkstone: boot script section not added in the fitimage

Hi Sébastien, On 11/14/22 14:50, sebastien.fabr...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am working on kirkstone. If UBOOT_ENV is specified and kernel-fitimage is in KERNEL_CLASSES, boot script section is not added in the fitimage. In fitimage_assemble (kernel-fitimage.bbclass), the 3 rd step is not

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] rockchip-defaults: remove xf86-input-keyboard

Hi Trevor, On 11/19/22 14:45, Trevor Woerner wrote: xf86-input-keyboard was removed from openembedded-core at its commit: f1d7c33b64 (xf86-input-keyboard: remove the recipe, 2022-07-20). Therefore > remove it from the XSERVER definition. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner Reviewed-by: Quentin

Re: [yocto] Image dependent variables/files in included recipes

Hi Maik, On 11/17/22 16:22, Maik Vermeulen wrote: Hi, Depending on the image that's being built, e.g. development vs. production, we would like to be able to include different user passwords and firewall settings. We know this can be achieved by just having two different recipes that do the

Re: [yocto] EXTRA_IMAGECMD:squashfs-xz support

Hi Jason, Sorry for the delay, your mail got lost in my pile of to-answer that never slims down apparently. On 10/19/22 00:48, Bills, Jason M wrote: Hello, Just checking if EXTRA_IMAGECMD:squashfs-xz:append failing to apply is expected or if it should be fixed? I just tested on

Re: [yocto] SRC_URI file://f.tar and destination

Hi Mauro, On 10/5/22 21:37, Mauro Ziliani wrote: Hi all. I'd like to explod a tar file into subdirectory of source file. The recipe fetch the original source from a git repos. I make a tar of folder I'd like to add to the original sources. SRC_URI := "\    

Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] scripts: run-docs-build: make the workdir pristine between builds

Hi Luka, On 10/4/22 22:54, Luca Ceresoli wrote: Hi Quentin, On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:15:20 +0200 Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Luca, On 10/3/22 23:15, Luca Ceresoli wrote: Hi Quentin, On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 19:04:01 +0200 "Quentin Schulz" wrote: From: Quentin Schulz It happened that the git

Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] scripts: run-docs-build: make the workdir pristine between builds

Hi Luca, On 10/3/22 23:15, Luca Ceresoli wrote: Hi Quentin, On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 19:04:01 +0200 "Quentin Schulz" wrote: From: Quentin Schulz It happened that the git repositories were dirty and resulted in incorrect files being used. Let's use git clean -ffdx to force a completely clean

Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] scripts: run-docs-build: make the workdir pristine between builds

Hi all, On 10/3/22 19:04, Quentin Schulz wrote: From: Quentin Schulz It happened that the git repositories were dirty and resulted in incorrect files being used. Let's use git clean -ffdx to force a completely clean git repositories before and after checking out a branch so that nothing is

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] layers: Add langdale to LAYERSERIES_COMPAT

Hi Khem, On 9/30/22 01:45, Khem Raj wrote: Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf index a2661f9..0e28857 100644 --- a/conf/layer.conf +++ b/conf/layer.conf @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@

Re: [yocto] meta-swupdate integration with the custom Yocto image #dunfell

Hi Mahendra Sondagar, On 9/25/22 19:38, Mahendra Sondagar wrote: Hey.. There Hope all are doing well I'm dealing with the swupdate with the my custom Yocto image created for STM32MP1 dk1 board The intend is, to update the rootfs remotely I have successfully integrated meta-swupdate layer

Re: [yocto] Problem with make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.

Hi Kuzemko Aleksandr, On 9/17/22 19:19, Kuzemko Aleksandr wrote: I am trying adapt fbi recipe.

Re: [yocto] [meta-oe][PATCH] externalsrc:git submodule--helper list unsupported

Hi John, On 9/15/22 20:43, John Broadbent via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: From: John Edward Broadbent Git has removed support for "git submodule--helper list".