[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 0/6] Some small dm-verity improvements

2020-09-07 Thread niko.ma...@vaisala.com
This set of patches addresses some small issues in dm-verity rootfs facility, which were observed while making use of dm-verity-img.bbclass to generate dm-verity rootfs images for real arm-based hardware. For purposes of establishing this changeset, the default 'qemux86-64' machine was used as a re

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 0/6] Some small dm-verity improvements

2020-09-07 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 7:17 PM Niko Mauno wrote: > > This set of patches addresses some small issues in dm-verity rootfs > facility, which were observed while making use of dm-verity-img.bbclass > to generate dm-verity rootfs images for real arm-based hardware. For > purposes of establishing this

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 0/6] Some small dm-verity improvements

2020-09-10 Thread niko.ma...@vaisala.com
On 7.9.2020 20.35, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: Hi Niko, I saw these patches and had to double-check just to realize my dm-verity patches actually got upstream to meta-security although I explicitly stated in the cover letter that they don't work with verified boot (which basically makes dm-verit

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 0/6] Some small dm-verity improvements

2020-09-12 Thread akuster
On 9/7/20 10:35 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 7:17 PM Niko Mauno wrote: >> This set of patches addresses some small issues in dm-verity rootfs >> facility, which were observed while making use of dm-verity-img.bbclass >> to generate dm-verity rootfs images for real arm-

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 0/6] Some small dm-verity improvements

2020-09-12 Thread akuster
On 9/7/20 10:17 AM, Niko Mauno wrote: > This set of patches addresses some small issues in dm-verity rootfs > facility, which were observed while making use of dm-verity-img.bbclass > to generate dm-verity rootfs images for real arm-based hardware. For > purposes of establishing this changeset, t