Hi Paul, Richard, Jan-Simon,
Thank you for your very useful sharing. I understand the concept.
Best Regards,
Duy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#62930): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/62930
Mute This Topic:
Hi Duy,
The recipe in question was done by the Instrument Cluster EG, we can work on
this with the group (main contact Yamaguchi-san). They do meet every other
monday. See: https://lists.automotivelinux.org/g/agl-dev-community/calendar
We do exacly what Paul describes all the time in meta-agl
On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 05:36 -0700, Duy wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for your response.
> Here is one of the recipe bbappend files I'm working on:
> meta-agl-ic-container/recipes-extended/dlt-daemon/dlt-
> daemon_%.bbappend · master · Automotive Grade Linux / AGL / meta-agl-
> devel · GitLab
>
On 08/04/2024 13:36, Duy wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for your response.
> Here is one of the recipe bbappend files I'm working on:
> meta-agl-ic-container/recipes-extended/dlt-daemon/dlt-daemon_%.bbappend ·
> master · Automotive Grade Linux / AGL / meta-agl-devel · GitLab
>
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your response.
Here is one of the recipe bbappend files I'm working on:
meta-agl-ic-container/recipes-extended/dlt-daemon/dlt-daemon_%.bbappend ·
master · Automotive Grade Linux / AGL / meta-agl-devel · GitLab (
On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 02:25 -0700, Duy wrote:
> I'm currently trying to make my software layer Yocto compatible.
> Running yocto-check-layer script is a convenient way.
> But in practice, I found that for software layer, it is difficult to
> make it pass test_signatures case. It requires to put
Hi,
I'm currently trying to make my software layer Yocto compatible. Running
yocto-check-layer script is a convenient way.
But in practice, I found that for software layer, it is difficult to make it
pass test_signatures case. It requires to put the condition check to every
variable or