[yocto] Dunfell 3.1.1 gcc-sanitizers build failure

2020-06-30 Thread MikeB
I recently tried upgrading from 3.1.0 to 3.1.1.  I'm not sure if this is a bug or just my problem.  I maintain five different architectures and all five have the same failure in gcc-sanitizers as I'm trying to build the SDK. | cat: /data/mabnhdev/exos-yocto-dunfell/build/exos-arm64/tmp/work-sha

Re: [yocto] Dunfell 3.1.1 gcc-sanitizers build failure

2020-06-30 Thread Khem Raj
On 6/30/20 2:56 PM, MikeB wrote: I recently tried upgrading from 3.1.0 to 3.1.1.  I'm not sure if this is a bug or just my problem.  I maintain five different architectures and all five have the same failure in gcc-sanitizers as I'm trying to build the SDK. | cat: /data/mabnhdev/exos-yocto

Re: [yocto] Dunfell 3.1.1 gcc-sanitizers build failure

2020-06-30 Thread Joshua Watt
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:56 PM MikeB wrote: > > I recently tried upgrading from 3.1.0 to 3.1.1. I'm not sure if this is a > bug or just my problem. I maintain five different architectures and all five > have the same failure in gcc-sanitizers as I'm trying to build the SDK. > > | cat: > /dat

Re: [yocto] Dunfell 3.1.1 gcc-sanitizers build failure

2020-06-30 Thread Joshua Watt
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:08 PM Joshua Watt wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:56 PM MikeB wrote: > > > > I recently tried upgrading from 3.1.0 to 3.1.1. I'm not sure if this is a > > bug or just my problem. I maintain five different architectures and all > > five have the same failure in g

Re: [yocto] Dunfell 3.1.1 gcc-sanitizers build failure

2020-06-30 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:53 PM Joshua Watt wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:08 PM Joshua Watt wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:56 PM MikeB wrote: > > > > > > I recently tried upgrading from 3.1.0 to 3.1.1. I'm not sure if this is > > > a bug or just my problem. I maintain five di

Re: [yocto] Dunfell 3.1.1 gcc-sanitizers build failure

2020-06-30 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:08 PM Steve Sakoman via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:53 PM Joshua Watt wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:08 PM Joshua Watt wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:56 PM MikeB wrote: > > > > > > > > I recently tried upgrading f

Re: [yocto] Dunfell 3.1.1 gcc-sanitizers build failure

2020-07-01 Thread MikeB
The combination of the https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/140161 and a 'bitbake -ccleansstate on gcc-source-9.3.0' has gotten me back on track. Thank you all for the help! On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:10 PM Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:08 PM Steve Sakom

Re: [yocto] Dunfell 3.1.1 gcc-sanitizers build failure

2020-07-01 Thread MikeB
The rumors of my success were exaggerated. If performing a fresh build from scratch, the image build succeeds, but the populate_sdk still fails as in the original post. If I then do a 'bitbake -ccleansstate on gcc-source-9.3.0', the populate_sdk succeeds. Mike On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 6:45 AM Mik

Re: [yocto] Dunfell 3.1.1 gcc-sanitizers build failure

2020-07-01 Thread Joshua Watt
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:47 AM MikeB wrote: > > The rumors of my success were exaggerated. If performing a fresh build from > scratch, the image build succeeds, but the populate_sdk still fails as in the > original post. If I then do a 'bitbake -ccleansstate on gcc-source-9.3.0', > the popula

Re: [yocto] Dunfell 3.1.1 gcc-sanitizers build failure

2020-07-02 Thread MikeB
Yes, I am using the archiver.bbclass. However, I'm using the one in poky/meta. I applied your patch (manually) to that one. diff --git a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass index a8d3afcbe9..bf275f4543 100644 --- a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/archiv