On 2023-10-13 11:14, Ross Burton wrote:
On 13 Oct 2023, at 15:20, Robert P. J. Day via lists.yoctoproject.org
wrote:
given that other acrhitectures have their own ML, is it reasonable
that risc-v have its own mailing list?
meta-arm, meta-intel etc are primarily because they take patches via
On 13 Oct 2023, at 15:20, Robert P. J. Day via lists.yoctoproject.org
wrote:
> given that other acrhitectures have their own ML, is it reasonable
> that risc-v have its own mailing list?
meta-arm, meta-intel etc are primarily because they take patches via the
mailing list.
meta-riscv (https:/
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 7:25 AM Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
>
> given that other acrhitectures have their own ML, is it reasonable
> that risc-v have its own mailing list?
We do not have generic architecture specific layers, existing mailing
lists should suffice for that matter.
I think you are r
given that other acrhitectures have their own ML, is it reasonable
that risc-v have its own mailing list?
rday
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#61333): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/61333
Mute This Topic: https://l