Re: [yocto] is there a viable YP-friendly risc-v dev kit?

2022-02-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting Leon Woestenberg : Hello Robert, Alexander, On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 23:04, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Alexander Kanavin : > I think the best option at this point is qemu. Why does the 'friend' need > physical hardware? :) he's a hacker and just likes the feel of circuit boa

Re: [yocto] is there a viable YP-friendly risc-v dev kit?

2022-02-04 Thread Leon Woestenberg
Hello Robert, Alexander, On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 23:04, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > Quoting Alexander Kanavin : > > > I think the best option at this point is qemu. Why does the 'friend' need > > physical hardware? :) > >he's a hacker and just likes the feel of circuit boards, but > qemu does

Re: [yocto] is there a viable YP-friendly risc-v dev kit?

2022-02-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting Alexander Kanavin : I think the best option at this point is qemu. Why does the 'friend' need physical hardware? :) he's a hacker and just likes the feel of circuit boards, but qemu does look like the only feasible option at the moment. rday -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You rec

Re: [yocto] is there a viable YP-friendly risc-v dev kit?

2022-02-04 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I think the best option at this point is qemu. Why does the 'friend' need physical hardware? :) Alex On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 22:48, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > friend asked me about the options for a risc-v dev kit that worked > with YP, and i'm aware of the meta-riscv layer, but wherever i looked,

[yocto] is there a viable YP-friendly risc-v dev kit?

2022-02-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
friend asked me about the options for a risc-v dev kit that worked with YP, and i'm aware of the meta-riscv layer, but wherever i looked, it seems like risc-v dev kits have a very short life span, being either put on hold or outright cancelled (beaglev, hifive unmatched, etc.) are there, in fact,