I second the point about updating the instructions. The whole point of
the quick start instructions is to let one quickly get their feet on the
ground. When the documentation is in error, it costs people time and
frustration. I spent a couple hours working in the dark since this is
new to me
This is the first of several staged changes to update the
kernel support for the 1.0 release.
This series is step 1:
- rename the supported kernel to 'linux-yocto' and update
the boards, and recipes that have references to linux-wrs.
Step 2 will refactor the code into reusable blocks
Step 3
Now that linuy-wrs has been renamed linux-yocto, we need
to rename and update an board configurations and append
files.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
meta-emenlow/conf/machine/emenlow.conf |2 +-
...x-wrs_git.bbappend => linux-yocto_git.bbappend} |0
meta/conf/machine/ato
The existing preferred yocto kernel wasn't named appropriately
and needs to be updated.
In keeping the changes small and isolated, this commit simply
renames the recipe and some internal variables. Future commits
will refactor the code into more usable blocks.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
Now that linux-wrs has been renamed linux-yocto, we need to
update the SRCREVs to have the new name.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
.../conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc | 24 ++--
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/distro
This commit fix [BUGID #514]
Some packages were removed from the world, but their information also exist in
the distro_tracking_fields.inc.
Signed-off-by: Mei Lei
---
.../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc | 591
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 591 deletions
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Hatle
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 7:18 AM
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] [Yocto] [PULL] devel/toolchain Recipes upgrades
On 11/9/10 12:12 AM, Bruce Ash
Hi Richard,
As we'll allow dynamic setup sysroot for app developers, I've done some
testing and here are some findings that want to further discuss with you:
1. We talked about using qemu rootfs as target sysroot, some I've tried pass
"--sysroot" to cross gcc and tested against one of our exist
On 11/15/2010 08:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
This is the first of several staged changes to update the
kernel support for the 1.0 release.
This series is step 1:
- rename the supported kernel to 'linux-yocto' and update
the boards, and recipes that have references to linux-wrs.
Step 2 w
Hi Jessica,
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:05 -0800, Zhang, Jessica wrote:
> As we'll allow dynamic setup sysroot for app developers, I've done
> some testing and here are some findings that want to further discuss
> with you:
>
> 1. We talked about using qemu rootfs as target sysroot, some I've
> tri
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 08:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>> This is the first of several staged changes to update the
>> kernel support for the 1.0 release.
>>
>> This series is step 1:
>>
>> - rename the supported kernel to 'linux-yocto' and update
>
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 08:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>> This is the first of several staged changes to update the
>> kernel support for the 1.0 release.
>>
>> This series is step 1:
>>
>> - rename the supported kernel to 'linux-yocto' and update
>
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 21:16 +0800, You, Yongkang wrote:
> This is latest weekly Yocto bug trend. The open bug number was 148.
For WW45, many more bugs look to have been fixed than submitted yet the
overall count still rose?
Cheers,
Richard
___
yocto
Richard,
Thanks for point it out. The submitted_fixed picture has a bug. Two WW45's
indicators should be exchanged, that 8 bugs were reported, but only 2 were
fixed. So the total open bug number is still going up.
Thanks,
Yongkang
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 7:35 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
Hi, xianchao
Did you start to do sprint A test for nightly build ? (
http://autobuilder.pokylinux.org/nightly/20101113-1/)
I think image downloaded is still slow.
Thanks,
Kunwei
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproje
On 11/16/2010 09:15 AM, Tian, Kunwei wrote:
Hi, xianchao
Did you start to do sprint A test for nightly build ? (
http://autobuilder.pokylinux.org/nightly/20101113-1/)
I think image downloaded is still slow.
Yes, we have completed downloading just now, so what's the differs
between M4
From: xianchao zhang
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:13 AM
>>On 11/16/2010 09:15 AM, Tian, Kunwei wrote:
>>Hi, xianchao
>>
>> Did you start to do sprint A test for nightly build ? (
>>http://autobuilder.pokylinux.org/nightly/20101113-1/)
>> I think image downloaded is still slow.
>
>Yes, we
From: xianchao zhang [mailto:xianchao.zh...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:13 AM
To: Tian, Kunwei
Cc: Liu, Changhui; yocto@yoctoproject.org; You, Yongkang; Xu, Jiajun
Subject: Re: about Sprint A Test
On 11/16/2010 09:15 AM, Tian, Kunwei wrote:
Hi, xianchao
Did you start
18 matches
Mail list logo
